A space analyst and sceptic, James Oberg turns up in the debate after several famous cases. Petrozavodsk, 1977. He argued that witnesses had been watching the exhaust of the Kosmos 955 launch from behind, and later compared the display to a 2015 Falcon 9. Over Tehran in 1976, he favoured Jupiter as the main light. He dismissed reports like the 2006 O'Hare sighting as of zero evidential value. The 2009 Norwegian spiral, he wrote, was yet another failed test. Ten years later he noted that the ordinary explanation had been rejected in favour of more exciting theories.
Stories5

Linked the event to the Kosmos-955 launch from Plesetsk

Former NASA Johnson Space Center engineer, the main sceptical analyst (ice and thruster explanation)

Space analyst and author of later essays on the event

