Documents / FOIA release
This is a report of investigation by the Central Intelligence Agency's Office of Inspector General, dated 18 July 2014. It covers Agency access to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staff files on RDINet, the network built for the Senate review of the rendition, detention and interrogation program. The report found that five Agency employees improperly accessed the SSCI Majority shared drive and that three IT staff lacked candor. It also found no factual basis for the CIA crimes report against SSCI staff.
Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.
# SECRET//NOFORN
tasked by email to obtain (b)(3)
(b)(3) The email acknowledged that this was a SSCI shared drive.
29. (U//FOUO) On 12 January 2014, sent an email to the RDINet IT team requesting new versions of the screenshots that showed Q:\ as the mapped drive letter vice Y:\ SSCI user access to the drive was mapped as requested these updated screenshots in order to "provide the optic" (e.g. display more accurately) that the folder was located on the SSCI Majority shared drive. Both complied with the request and emailed responses on 13 January 2014.
30. (C//NF) At OIG's request provided OIG an email and attachments dated 13 January 2014 from to and copying The (b)(3))(3) email documented the RDINet IT team's response to 12 Januarv tasking and (b)(6))(6) contained snapshots of the contents of the folder (b)(3) (b)(7)(c)) (b)(3) properties and security settings for a document titled "WCR MJA," and a capture of the virtual folder "My Computer", showing the drive Q:\labeled as "Share Majority Data." also responded to a series of questions (b)(3) from regarding the number of files in (b)(3) (b)(6) and in its subfolders, as well as information regarding SSCI privileges on RDINet. (b)(7)
31. (U//FOUO) Between 5 June and 13 June 2014, OIG and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms conducted a joint forensic review of the RDINet log data. The review determined that relevant logs containing file access and security information were not retained appropriately $ ^{8} $ . A review of file meta-data did not show any CIA users as having altered the WCR documents contained in the Q:\ drive, but did not contain sufficient information to assess access by CIA users.
32. (C//NF) During the course of the investigation, OIG determined that RDINet IT officers___were not forthcoming in their initial interviews with OIG, having failed to disclose the assistance they provided to___in the searches of RDINet between 9 and 13 January 2014. As a result, OIG requested second interviews with each officer. ___complied with the second interview requests and admitted to the conduct when confronted with the information from the emails:___declined a second interview.
33. (S//NF) OIG investigation found that on 10 January 2014 tasked(b)(3) to conduct a review of activity on the SSCI side of RDINet. As a part of the review requested by ran queries against previously archived RDINet data to determine whether the documents in question had been accessed by SSCI staff. The date Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 57 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.