Documents / FOIA release
This is a report of investigation by the Central Intelligence Agency's Office of Inspector General, dated 18 July 2014. It covers Agency access to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staff files on RDINet, the network built for the Senate review of the rendition, detention and interrogation program. The report found that five Agency employees improperly accessed the SSCI Majority shared drive and that three IT staff lacked candor. It also found no factual basis for the CIA crimes report against SSCI staff.
Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.
# SECRET//NOFORN range of the review focused on the 2010 to 2013 time period. (b)( (b)(3) as a part of any of the activities in question during the January 2014 time frame. (b)(3) all data reviewed by (b)(3) at the request of the RDI team was historically logged information. (b)(3) 34. (C//NF) In multiple communications with stated th(b)(7)(c) the requests for review were being made on behalf of D/CIA Brennan. On 9 January 2014, (b)(3) called CIC alerting her to a forthcoming "D/CIA (b)(6) tasking". tasked(b)(3) by email on the morning of 10 January 2014, requesting that the (b)(7)(c) team provide contained in the (b)(3) (b)(3) folder of RDINet for the period 1 March 2009 to 31 December 2013. (b)(6) replied to the email, stating that the D/CIA wanted the results of the review that afternoon. (b)(7)(c) provided a response in the form of an Excel spreadsheet (b)(3) (b)(3) (b)(3) on the afternoon of 10 January 2014. Following receipt (b)(6) of this information, emailed(b)(3) and stated that the D/CIA had requested (b)(3) (b)(7)(c) for the same folder and requested a response by Monday, 13 January 2014. On 13 January, (b)(3) provided with an Excel spreadsheet of the requested (b)(3) On the afternoon of 13 January 2014, tasked(b)(3) with determining the provenance of the (b)(3) documents contained in the aforementioned folder. This task was not completed, as D/CIA (b)(6) Brennan directed that no further work be performed by(b)(3) at a meeting on 14 January 2014. (b)(7) 35. (U//FOUO) Despite representations by to CIC (b)(3) (b)(3) that D/CIA Brennan directed the aforementioned taskings to OIG did not find (b)(6) evidence to support any such direction. (b)(3) (b)(7) 36. (U//FOUO) Due to conflicting information obtained by OIG through the course of the investigation, OIG could not determine whether any of D/CIA Brennan's senior staff, much less the D/CIA himself, approved any of the taskings made to(b)(3) In his mentioned consulting with and and informing them that he would be tasking (3) to determine if the documents were accessed by SSCI users. Neither nor recalled approving any tasking, and OIG did not identify documentary evidence confirming any approvals. 37. (U//FOUO) D/CIA Brennan told OIG that he first learned of the concerns regarding documents on RDINet from___on the evening 9 January 2014. D/CIA Brennan stated that he recalled___ referring to a review of (b)(3) but that he did not recall if ___ explained how anyone knew the location of the documents. Subsequently, D/CIA Brennan spoke to___ on 10 and 11 January 2014. According to___ D/CIA Brennan tasked him to "use whatever means necessary" to find out how the documents had ended up on the SSCI shared drive. D/CIA Brennan told OIG that he only asked___ "are we sure" that the documents were CIA documents and that he wanted to better understand the RDINet system architecture. (b)(3)
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 57 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.