Documents / Document

The UFO files extract

The National Archives · 22 pages · text from the file's own layer

The National Archives published this edited extract from Chapter 2 of David Clarke's 2009 book The UFO Files, which draws on Ministry of Defence UFO records. It covers Stan Hubbard's 1950 Farnborough sightings, which the Flying Saucer Working Party attributed to optical illusion or normal aircraft. It also covers Churchill's 1952 memo asking about flying saucers, the Topcliffe sighting during Operation Mainbrace, a Meteor crew's sighting from Little Rissington, and RAF research concluding that most radar 'angels' were birds.

definite edge to it. And the whole of the edge was a mass of tiny crack-
ling, sparkling lights. And associated with that, there was a real impact of
a very strong ozone smell.
‘There were no windows or portholes or any other characteristics at
all. It was featureless, and the remarkable thing about it was there was no
sound of air movement … as the object was coming closer and then went
overhead I tried to estimate its size, altitude and speed, but with the
absence of any readily identifiable feature it was difficult to gauge these
factors with any confidence… I guessed that its height above ground
when first seen was probably between 700 and 1000 [ ft ] and since it
certainly seemed to maintain altitude throughout the period of my
observation, I guessed that it would have to be about 100 ft in diameter.
It must have been travelling very fast, perhaps as high as 500 to 900
mph.’
Hubbard immediately reported this sighting to his commanding officer and
soon afterwards received a visit from members of the Ministry of Defence’s
Flying Saucer Working Party, which had been established that same month
to look into the UFO mystery. Chaired by G.L. Turney, head of scientific
intelligence at the Admiralty, it included five intelligence officers, two of
whom were scientists, the other three representing the intelligence branches
of the army, navy and RAF. Hubbard recalled the questions included:
‘“How high was it?” “How big was it?” “How fast was it?” “What was
it?” … and one question which I think reflects the tenor of the interview
was: “What do you suppose the object was, and where would it have
come from?” I replied simply that in my opinion it was not something
that had been designed and built on this Earth. Clearly, from the effect it
had on the team, it was the wrong answer.’
The working party’s visit to Farnborough would not be the last. On the
afternoon of 5 September 1950, just two weeks after Hubbard’s first obser-
vation, he saw what he believes was the same object again. On this occasion
he was standing with five other serving RAF airmen on the watch-tower
waiting for a display by the Hawker P.1081 when he spotted the object in
the sky to the south of the airfield, towards Guildford. ‘I grabbed hold of the
chap next to me,’ he recalled, ‘and said: “Hey, what do you think that is?”
Pointing … and he shouted “My God! Go get a camera quick! Go get some
binoculars!”’
Hubbard and his colleagues then watched an incredible performance of
aerobatics by what the official report describes as ‘a flat disc, light pearl in
colour [ and ] about the size of a shirt button.’ Hubbard described it as
‘fluttering, as though bordering on instability, in a hovering mode, the
object would swoop off in a slight dive at incredibly high speed and in
quite stable flight, then stop abruptly and go into another fluttering hover
4 4 T H E F LY I N G S A U C E R A G E

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 22 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.