Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 325 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary Part II transcript of the Gemini 5 (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division and dated September 2, 1965. It records astronauts Cooper and Conrad at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy. They discuss how the spacecraft systems worked, including the platform and the OAMS thruster failures. The transcript also covers operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, training, premission planning, and medical aspects. It was originally classified Confidential.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 30 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper and Charles “Pete” Conrad described observing debris and “snow” and “all sorts of glittering pieces of this, that and the other thing” in the “Visual Sightings” section of the document (pages 157-220).

33
Cooper I think we had some bias, just how much I don ' t lmow.
The timing of the translation was fine , updating was
fine. Operations and checklist were okay. Computer
usage, okay.
Conrad It was easier to make a burn on the simulator that
had no up- down or left and right in it than it was
in the spacecraft . Gordo did a real good job of
tracking on every burn and I didn't see it wander
hardly at all .
Cooper And all the IVI ' s would be zero .
Conrad And all the IVI 1 s would be zero, but we'd have .4. of
10
a foot in one axis and ~O in another.
Conrad 8
Yes . The worst cross- coupling, we had 10 in one
axis, and when we burned in the platform mode, but
we were checking that . It could have been accelero
meter bias again, or, the spacecraft is more sensi- •
tive to picking up up- down and l eft- right velocities
than I thought it was .
Conrad Gordo did a real good job of tracking. He tracked
as well as he did in the simulator and we never had
this show up in another axis in the simulator .
Cooper It would be zero , zero , zero in the simulator.
Conrad It was hardly worth my time checking address 81 and
82 in the simulator because I could just tell he

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 325 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.