Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 325 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary Part II transcript of the Gemini 5 (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division and dated September 2, 1965. It records astronauts Cooper and Conrad at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy. They discuss how the spacecraft systems worked, including the platform and the OAMS thruster failures. The transcript also covers operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, training, premission planning, and medical aspects. It was originally classified Confidential.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 30 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper and Charles “Pete” Conrad described observing debris and “snow” and “all sorts of glittering pieces of this, that and the other thing” in the “Visual Sightings” section of the document (pages 157-220).

32
Cooper
Conrad
Conrad
good . Ther e again , it might have been a f unction of
the thrusters going out .
In any event , I think that 1 s an error ,;hat somebody
needs to look i nto . I ' m n ot sure that pl atfor m mode
is doing what i t should. I know that , t heoretically , •
and by t he diagrams on it and the limit s that it
ought to be a ver y pr ecise control mod E! .
Spacecraft separation at SECO + 20 couldn ' t have been
better , jus t fine . Translat i on per igeE! adjust went
like cl ockwork.
Tha t was our fi r st r eal burn and I thi r.k we got
something like 9 . 6 f t/sec on t he IVI ir.stead of
10 . 0 , but t he burn wasn ' t that crit icaJ .
I checked accelerometer bias and it seE•med like the
accel er ometer bias incr eased l a t er in the f light .
I specif icall y checked it f or the REP end it was
okay . I 1 d just set up zer os in the wirdow and
went to Catch- Up and they stayed zero for 3 or
4 minutes or longer . So that satisfied me . I
checked it l ater on in the f light and I don ' t think
we r an more than a minute and we clickEd up a
f oot per second on the fore - aft window. That can
be checked on the tape . In the beginning it was
entirely acceptable for the REP .

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 325 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.