AAWSAP DIRD, Maverick Inventor Versus Corporate Inventor: Where Will the Next Major Innovations Arise, March 2010

This Defense Intelligence Agency reference document is dated 30 March 2010. The Defense Warning Office prepared it under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program. It compares lone maverick inventors with corporate inventors who work in think tanks and other large organizations, focusing on unconventional energy and propulsion, including antigravity. It sorts inventors into five types. It concludes that formally trained mavericks (Types 3 and 4) are the most likely source of the next innovations. Untrained inventors are expected to contribute nothing substantial.

From the source:Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 3/30/10, Las Vegas, Nevada. Released with redactions. This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD compares lone “maverick” inventors with researchers working inside larger organizations in order to ask where major future breakthroughs are most likely to come from, especially in unconventional energy and propulsion. It concludes that the strongest candidates are technically trained, relatively independent, and flexible researchers working with some freedom from institutional constraint. Because that preferred profile closely resembles the kind of researcher who appears to have authored or shaped much of the broader AAWSAP DIRD effort, the document reflects a notable methodological circularity, validating the program’s operational model rather than neutrally assessing the innovation ecosystem.

UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOR OFFICIAL tt!iE 81'1L:¥
20 http ://www.searleffect.com/free/jt_biodetail.html, accessed Jan 12, 2009
21 http://www.steorn.com/, accessed Jan 12, 2009
22 Cambier, J-L., Micheletti, D.A., "Theoretical Analysis of the Electron Spiral Toroid Concept," NASA Report
NASA/CR-2000-210654, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Dec. 2000
23 http://www.law rencevilleplasmap hysics.com/, accessed Jan 12, 2009
24 http://gammamanager.blogspot.com/, accessed Jan 14, 2009
25 Woodward, J., "Flux Capacitors and the Origin of Inertia" Foundations of Physics, Vol. 34, pg 1475, 2004.
26 Little, S.R., "Null Tests of "Free-Energy" Claims," Frontiers of Propu lsion Science, (in print), MIiiis, M.G ., Davis,
E.W. (eds), Progress in Astronauti cs and Aerona utics Series, 227, AIAA, 2009
27 Hathaway, G.D., "Nightmares of the Art of Measuring," Space Technologies and Applications International Forum
2006, El Genk, M.S. (ed.) American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, Melville, NY, 2006
28 Graneau, P., Graneau, N., et al "Arc-Liberated Chemical Energy Exceeds Electrical Input Energy" J. Plasma
Physics Vol. 63, part 2, pg 115, 2000
29 http://www.dekaresearch.com/aboutDean.html, accessed Jan 13, 2009
30 http://ovshinskyinnovation.com/, (under construction) accessed Jan 2009
31 http://clever-fellows-innovation -consortium .sbcontract.com/profile .htm, accessed Jan 15, 2009
32 Millis, M.G., "The NASA Breakthrough Pro pulsion Project: Methods of Advanced Research," AIAA Professional
Short Course, NASA Glenn Research Center, 2003
33 Millis, M.G., "Prioritizing Pioneering Research," Frontiers of Propulsion Science, (in pri nt), Millis, M.G., Davis, E.W.
(eds), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics Series, 227, AIAA, 2009
UNCLASSIFIED/ (FOR OFFICI0L: Mi& 8Ptl\f
14