Documents / Official release
This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, dated 14 December 2009, was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency's Defense Warning Office under its Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications program. It is a technical review of metallic glasses that covers their structure, processing, mechanical behavior and possible aerospace uses. It concludes that composites with ductile dendrites in a glass matrix hold the most promise for structural use. It also finds that widespread aerospace adoption depends on developing new lightweight glass-forming alloys.
From the source: Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 12/14/09, Las Vegas, Nevada. Released with redactions. This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD surveys metallic glasses as a potentially important class of aerospace materials and describes their amorphous structure as offering very high strength and unusual manufacturing advantages, but also significant drawbacks, especially poor ductility and fatigue resistance. The document concludes that the most promising aerospace applications are likely to come from metallic-glass-matrix composites rather than single-phase glasses, because these composites can retain high strength while greatly improving fracture toughness and fatigue performance, potentially enough to substitute for high-strength steels in some space-limited structural uses. At the same time, the report judges that broader aerospace use will depend on substantial progress over the next 20–50 years in alloy design, processing, and especially the development of lightweight systems, including aluminum-based options.
UNCLASSIFIED// FOR OFFICIAL tt!I! 8,.LY One way to quantify the ability of a metallic alloy to be produced in glassy form is through the critical cooling rate - the slowest rate at wh ich a metallic liquid may be cooled and still produce a fully amorphous structure, as shown in Figure 2(a). The critical cooling rate for a variety of metallic glass-forming alloys is shown in Figure 2(b). Early metallic glasses (discovered in the 1960s and 1970s) were binary alloys with critical cooling rates typically on the order of 104 to 107 K/s. Achieving such high cooling rates requires specialized techniques (such as melt spinning) and limits the maximum thickness of the metallic glass to < 100 μm because of the need to rapidly extract heat from the melt. As a result, these early metallic glasses could be produced in only a limited range of forms, including ribbons, foils, wires, and powders. Extensive research efforts in alloy design over the past two decades have resulted in the development of multi-component alloys with much lower critical cooling rates (0.1 K/s or even lower). This has enabled the production of metallic glass specimens in larger sizes-in some cases exceeding 1-cm section thickness. Common practice in the field is to refer to any alloy capable of being cast into a section at least 1-mm thick as a "bulk" metallic glass. These alloys may be cast or molded into forms suitable for structural applications. At present, it is not possible to predict a priori the glass-forming ability of an alloy of arbitrary composition. A variety of empirical rules for selecting alloying elements and compositions have been proposed, and techniques have been demonstrated for efficient searching of composition space. But identification of alloys with good glass-forming ability is still mostly a matter of trial and error. As a result, the number of truly outstanding glass-forming alloys (loosely defined as being able to be cast as a glass to a thickness of at least 1 cm) is quite limited (see Table 1). Table 1. Selected Bulk Glass-Forming Alloys. Selected alloys reported to have excellent glass forming ability, quantified here as the maximum thickness of a fully amorphous casting. 2 3 4 s 6 7 s Composition Maximum Thickness (mm) Reference MgGsCu 1sAgsPdsGd 10 10 2 Zr41.2Ti 13.sCu 12.sNi 10 Be 22.s 50 3 Pd40Cu 30Ni 10P:w 72 4 CU41Zr4sAg4Al4 10 5 Pts1.sCU14_7Nis.J P22.s 16 6 Ti40Zr2sNi3Cu 12Be20 14 7 Fe4sCr1sM014Er2C1sBG 12 8 Moving from the laboratory to industrial practice, it is important to note that factors besides alloy composition can affect glass-forming ability. In particular, some alloys are sensitive to the presence of impurities; for example, the glass-forming ability of some zirconium-containing alloys is dramatically reduced by the presence of oxygen. Processing conditions also influence the ability to make a glass; these may include the material and surface finish of the mold and the temperature of the liquid prior to casting . Finally, glass-forming ability can be quite sensitive to small variations in composition, which may be difficult to control in industrial practice. 3 UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOR OFFI&IAk WSE 8Hk¥
Not linked to a story yet.
Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 30 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.