Public Affairs emails with The Debrief

(b)(6)
From:
mailto (b)(6) >
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 6:08 AM
mailto: (b)(6) »
 < Caution-Caution-
mailto ())(6) < Caution-mailto 0)0) »
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] (rvEDlA REQUEST- TIME SENSITIVE) Request For Popular Mechanics
Sorry, working on these now. It may take a couple days to get cleared responses on all of them.
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] (MEDIA REQUEST- TIME SENSITIVE) Request For Popular Mechanics
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.
(b)(6)
I understand you're likely very busy, however, I wanted to follow-up again on several questions I
asked back on December 9th of last year. I'm sure you're likely tired of answering questions related
to UAP, UFOs, or AATIP, however, I may be on the cusp of being able to provide clarity to a number
of these issues, which ultimately could help get some of these constant request directed to you office
reduced. If you could assist me at your earliest convenience, it would be greatly appreciated.
Here are the questions I asked on December 9th, along with just a few others I'm hoping you'll be
able to answer. Thank you again for all your assistance.
• The following statement has been attributed to you by several outlets recently, "Neither AATIP
nor AAWSAP were UAP related. The purpose of AATIP was to investigate foreign
5