Documents / FOIA release

UFOsandUAPs ADA034236

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 25 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a technical report by Thomas E. Bearden, a research scientist with an MS in nuclear engineering, dated January 3, 1977. Bearden submitted it to the Defense Documentation Center under a cover letter and it is approved for public release. The report divides the evolution of life into seven stages and argues that humanity must avoid self-destruction by technologically linking all human brains into a single superbeing. It claims UFO phenomena are consistent with a sixth-stage superbeing preparing humanity for that linkage.

are ze10ed out, by the equations of the special relativity transformation. Thus
one rnc.y view (hypervie.w) each triangle (brain) as superposed on each other
triangle (brain). Further, there exists a very small, finite, nonzero probability
that the state of one triangle coincides exactly with the state of another superposed
triangle, at any given small increment of time. This probability corresponds to
a direct fraction of identity between two triangles, since "time is stopped" along
the chain. I.e., at any given small increment of labcratory time, any given
triangle has on the average a small fraction of identical coexistence with any
other triangle. This identity fraction is labelled Ik in figure 1.
It is important to note that, for a very small fraction of time, each
triangle coincides with each other; i.e., for a small fraction of time the
existence of one triangle is totally holographic. This fraction totally violates
the ordinary conservation of energy, which is applicable only to a single channel
system. The hyperchannel rep~esents a second channel, an identity channel, and
in this channel an object can be in multiple places at the same time. If the
triangles, regarded as operating processes, are even slightly coherent, then
multichannel communication and holographic transmission of a single state-energy
into multiple state-energies occurs through the hyper channel. Using figure 2,
we now proceed to calcula tc the hyperchannel effect.
First, we choose any stage i and a second stage j. The ordinary input
to stage i is simply the output of the previous stage, stage (i-1). That output is
(1)
where Ei represents the original inceptive input to a triangle. I.e., the
ordinary input is just the product of the "amplifier gains" of tha previous stages
multiplied times the original input to the inline amplifier array. The ordinary
output of stage i will then be
(2)
Now on examining stage j, we realize that it is hyperlinked back to stage i by
the identity fraction Ik, and so are all other stages. Thus the total hyperchanr..el
i11put to stage I is
(3)
and the hyperchannel output of stage I will therefore be
n
Ao 2 Abi:tik (4)
j :::: 1 12.

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 25 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.