Documents / FOIA release
This is a technical report by Thomas E. Bearden, a research scientist with an MS in nuclear engineering, dated January 3, 1977. Bearden submitted it to the Defense Documentation Center under a cover letter and it is approved for public release. The report divides the evolution of life into seven stages and argues that humanity must avoid self-destruction by technologically linking all human brains into a single superbeing. It claims UFO phenomena are consistent with a sixth-stage superbeing preparing humanity for that linkage.
APPENDIX I: THE HOLOGRAPHIC HYPERCHANNEL EFFECT This effect is based on the concept that a human being must accomplish a minute inception (psychokinesis} onto his physical system. Specifically, he must incept the movement of three or four electrons in the brain. This constitutes then an input signal to his ordinary physical system, which is then viE. wed as a complex servomechanism. The gai.1 of this servomechanism is rather high, being able to transform or "amplify" the movement of several electrons int:> powerful movements of the entire body. The inceptive effect cannot be explained by ordinary physics, which can account for the servomechanism gain only. Once the input signal is generated, however, the rest of the amplification and action are viewed as being properly described by ordinary physics of inert matter. Thus the human is viewed as largely servomechanistic and mechanical, but guided and directed by the nonphysical which affects or alters the physical in a minute fashion sufficient to constitute inputfi to the ordinary physical system. Our purpose here is to show that, given this single small human inceptive effect, linkage of multiple brains in coherent fashion leads to an exponential increase in the inceptive effect, thus eventually approaching the absolute mastery of space and time for a linkage of f'iufficient number of human brains and minds into one single superbrain and supermind. From the multiplicity of orthogonal frames permitted by Everett's many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, we now select an infinite set of clustered 3-dimensional spatial frames which all share a single time dimension in common. Using one frame as a laboratory reference frame, the other spatial frames may be characterized as having one, two, tt.ree, or more orthogonal turns away from the laboratory frame. These succeedi -~< orchogonal frames are variously called hyperframes, bioframes, orthoframes, hyperchannels, orthoworlds, etc. A particular set of material phenomena in one of the orthoframes is referred to as a biofield, hyperfield, or orthofield with respect to the laboratory frame. In figure 1, we represent each brain by a triangular symbol, and consider it as an amplifying device having a gain of A0 • For simplicity, the incepti''·J input signal is represented as Ei, since in moving an electron, a voltage must be induced. For simplicity, we also show the brains as a linear array lying in a straight line. The distance L separates each brain, and here Lis assumed constant for simplicity. Two factors must now b~ realized: (1} the first hyperchannel operates in the realm of the ordinary electromagnetic field, although this realm is visualized much differently from normal considerations. I.e. , we visualize a photon as an ordinary particle of 3-dimensional matter, resting in a 3-dimensional spatial frame (hyperframe) that ib orthogonally rotated spatially in higher dimensional space, at 900 to the observer's spatial frame. The hyperframe and the laboratory frame share the same 4th dimension, time, in common, however. (2) At the speed c (which determines the hyperframe in the first place}, all L's ll.
FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 25 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.