Documents / Report

UAP Reporting Procedures FY2023 (FOIA 23-F-0241)

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 2023 · 2 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a Department of Defense priority language appeal on the FY2023 National Defense Authorization Bill, released under FOIA case 23-F-0241. It responds to House bill H.R. 7900, section 1663, which would require a secure system for reporting UAP events, run by AARO, along with searches for UAP-related nondisclosure agreements. The Department objects to the provision. It cites presidential authority over classified information, counterintelligence risks, resource costs and risks to the safety of AARO staff, and it urges that the provision be excluded or revised.

Priority Department of Defense Language Appeal
FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Bill
Subject: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Reporting Procedures
Appeal Citation: H.R. 7900, sec. 1663
23-F-0241
Language/Provision: House section 1663 would require the Department of Defense (DoD) to establish a secure system
for receiving reports of any event relating to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) as well as any government or
government contractor activity or program related to UAP at all classification levels. The secure system would be
administered by "designated and widely known, easily accessible and appropriately cleared" employees or contractors
assigned to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), and information about the secure system, including clear
publ ic guidance for accessing and using the system, would be made available to the public on a DoD website.
Additionally, the heads of all departments and agencies of the Federal Government that have supported UAP
investigations, including the Secretary of Defense, would be required to conduct comprehensive searches all records
relating to non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), orders, or other obligations relating to UAP and make them accessible to
the congressional intelligence committees, congressional defense committees, and congressional leadership.
Finally, the proposal would enable personnel to report through the secure system any information which might otherwise
have implicated a written or oral NOA, order, or other instrument that could be interpreted as a legal constraint. The
Senate Armed Services Committee included no similar provision in its version of the National Defense Authorization Act,
but the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence included a similar provision in its mark of the Intelligence Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2023, S. 4503, section 704.
DoD Position/Impact: The Department objects to the House provision because, as written, it could intrude on the
President's constitutional authority to manage classified information, information security, and information security
systems. The requirements would also present unnecessary national security and counterintelligence risks by requiring
the establishment of a publicly acknowledged system, with clear guidance to the public on how to access and use it, that is
meant to provide for the sharing of classified and potentially compartmented information. The Department is concerned
that establishing and managing such a system would be a resource-intensive undertaking that would detract critical
personnel and financial resources from other important functions of the recently establ ished AARO.
The Department shares the goal of establishing a secure mechanism to encourage and protect individuals who provide
potentially classified information regarding UAP or UAP-related programs to authorized personnel in the AARO with the
requisite need to know. However, the Department has existing authorities and mechanisms to enable such reporting that
would fulfill the intent of the House provision without its associated concerns. For example, the Secretary of Defense
may already authorize Department personnel to receive information, regardless of classification, in a protected manner
consistent with Executive Order 13526, Executive Order 12968, and corresponding DoD and Office of the Director of
National Intelligence directives.
The Department is also concerned that the requirement for the system to be administered by "widely known" and "easily
accessible" DoD and Intelligence Community employees assigned to the AARO may present privacy, security, and
personal safety risks to such personnel given the potentially polarizing nature of the UAP subject. To ensure the identities
and contact information of such personnel are not inappropriately disclosed, the Department would object to the inclusion
of the words "widely known" and "easily accessible" in subsection (b)(3) of the proposed provision.
Moreover, the language in subsection (c)(l) of the proposed provision assumes that the Department has the resources and
capability to search for, retrieve, and provide all records relating to nondisclosure orders or agreements or other
obligations- some of which may be decades old and implicate the Privacy Act- that will satisfy an unspecified
congressional purpose. Indeed, any statutory requirement to establish a new system outside of existing and established
mechanisms would require the expenditure of personnel and financial resources that would be better served elsewhere.
As such, DoD is willing to work with Congress to achieve our common goals and objectives related to UAP reporting
within existing frameworks.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 2 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.