Documents / Report
This undated National Security Agency file reviews a June 1978 report by GEPAN, the French government's UFO study group, which covers its work in the first half of 1978. GEPAN examined 11 high-credibility, high-strangeness cases in France in detail. Only one had a conventional explanation. In the other 10, investigators concluded that the witnesses saw a material phenomenon that was neither natural nor a human device. The review, submitted by Ron Westrum, also notes that GEPAN's report covers the Teheran case.
... ·.. · .... _............ . ......•., :- ........ ; . : ' ... •:.·-.·.· .: .. FRENCH GOVERNMENT UFO STUDY •presentation to the Scientific Counsel of G.E.P.A.N. of Studies Undertaken During the First Semester of 1978," (June 1978, 5 volumes, approximately 500 pages). This report of the French governmental UFO study group GEPAN1 documents the studies carried out by the group during the first part of 1978. Three special groups (rapid intervention, physical traces, radar alert) were created as part of the study group's functions, but they were little used during 1978. Instead, the bulk of work was devoted to 11 cases of high credibility and high strangeness. Eieven such cases were studied in great detail; only one proved to have a conventional explanation. In the other 10, it appeared .that the distance between the witnesses and the objects was less than 250 meters. Of the five volumes of the report, three were entirely devoted to analysis of these 11 cases, all except one of which was pre·1978. The earliest was 1966. Two of the cases were humanoid sightings. The analysis and investigation was carried out. by a four-"person team in each case; the team included a psychologist, who separately carried out a psychological examination relevant to the evaluation of the testimony of the witnesses. The care with which distances, angles, and psychological factors were evaluated makes the bulk of the Condon Report seem very poor by comparison. In many cases, the investigations were textbook models of how. such investigations should be carried out. In 10 of the 11 cases, the ~lusion was that the witMsses had witnessed a material phenomenon that could not be explained as a natural phenomenon or a human device. One of the conclusions of the total report is that bel)ind the overall phenomenon there is a "flying machine. . . whose modes of sustenance and propulsion are beyond our knowledge." GEPAN was created in 1977, l.Dlder the direction of Dr. Claude 6 Poher. Poher has now resigned, feeling that he has done everything he co~ld do with the methods at hand. Nonetheless, the organization has not been disbanded but continues its work. During 1977. it was largely concerned with checking Poher's statistics, which it approved.2 During 1978, it has expanded its operation into the investigation of actual cases. It is alerted to actual cases by teletype by the Genclarmerie, the French national police force. The above report has reportedly been approved by GEPAN's supervisory scientl.'ic counsel. Note: the original repbrt was limited to 120 or 140 copies and was secret. It is not available for general dissemination, and in any case is in French. There is extensive coverage in the report of the T eheran case, but nothing beyond what is. known to American researchers; it was not one of threleven cases studied, all of which were in France. !Group d'Etudes Des Phenomenes Al!ro- spatiaux Non-ldentifiees 2Although it did study two nocturnal light cases, both of which ended up labelled "unidentified". __ (Submitted by Ron Westrum.)
Report, from the nsa collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 1 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.