Documents / Document

Kean v. NASA, 1:03-cv-02509

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (govinfo) · 21 pages · text from the file's own layer

This memorandum opinion by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, dated March 27, 2007, rules in Leslie Kean's FOIA suit against NASA over records about the object said to have crashed in Kecksburg, Pennsylvania on December 9, 1965. The court found NASA had not shown its searches were adequate and noted likely overlooked Cosmos 96 records. It upheld NASA's withholding of two emails under Exemption 5 and ordered the parties to propose new search procedures.

18
must be narrowly construed in favor of disclosure. U.S. Dep’t of
Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976). The government
bears the burden of justifying the withholding of any requested
documents through agency affidavits, an index of withheld
documents, or both. U.S. Dep’t of State v. Ray, 502 U.S. 164,
173 (1991); Coastal States Gas Corp. v. DOE, 617 F.2d 854, 861
(D.C. Cir. 1980).
Plaintiff challenges defendant’s withholding of two emails
pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5. Exemption 5 protects “inter-agency
or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be
available by law to a party . . . in litigation with the agency.”
5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5). This language has been construed to exempt
those documents that would not be routinely available to an
agency’s opponent in a civil discovery context and to incorporate
all evidentiary privileges that would be available in that
context. See Rockwell Int’l Corp. v. DOJ, 235 F.3d 598, 601
(D.C. Cir. 2001). In its Vaughn index, defendant describes the
emails as, “[t]wo emails between the NASA FOIA Officer and a
Senior Attorney W. Bierbower seeking legal advice; these emails
were dated [November] 4 and 5, 2003, pertaining to the request to
be interviewed [sic] by SciFi.” 1st McConnell Decl., Vaughn
Index #101. Defendant asserts that these emails are protected
under both the deliberative process privilege and attorney-client
privilege.
Case 1:03-cv-02509-EGS Document 45 Filed 03/27/07 Page 18 of 21

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 21 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.