Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth (hearing transcript)

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2024-11-13 · 52 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of a joint hearing held November 13, 2024 by two subcommittees of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, chaired by Rep. Nancy Mace. The witnesses were Tim Gallaudet, Luis Elizondo, Michael Shellenberger and Michael Gold. They addressed government secrecy, AARO's transparency, a Pentagon document on the alleged Immaculate Constellation program, threats to pilot safety, and UAP activity near nuclear and military sites. Members also discussed UAP disclosure legislation.

  • p. 4 …Burchett. * Report, Pentagon, ‘‘Immaculate Constellation’’; submitted by Rep. Mace. * Questions for the Record: to Mr. Elizondo…
  • p. 6 …Part of the transparency effort was legislation created in the Pentagon, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution…
  • p. 7 …But this is going to be the original document from the Pentagon about Immaculate Constellation that…
  • p. 16 …Currently, the White House, CIA, NASA, the Pentagon, Depart-
  • p. 18 …Government offi- cials who have told Congress that AARO and the Pentagon have broken the law…
  • p. 19 …Two of the three potential explanations are blacked out. The Pentagon, the intelligence community is treating…
  • p. 25 …And then, in 2009 timeframe, when I came back to the Pentagon after a tour with…
  • p. 42 …Pentagon, by the Department of Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review. And it states that…
  • p. 43 …bit when I was at the Pentagon. The problem is, the supposed collection of these biologi…
  • p. 44 …What I can say was, after a very thorough review process by the Pentagon, what I…
  • p. 46 …Are y’all aware of any task force at the Pentagon or in the national security…
  • p. 47 …And do you believe that there is a concerted effort by the Pentagon to keep Congress…
45
Ms. MACE. And in the UAP space? That is all that—they would
not do submerged?
Mr. ELIZONDO. No, I did not say that ma’am.
Ms. MACE. OK.
Mr. ELIZONDO. Lockheed Martin and others do quite a bit of
work both in our atmosphere, in space, and even underwater.
There are certain efforts to—it is a tough question you are asking.
You are putting me on the spot here.
Ms. MACE. I’m asking—I’m looking for the answer.
Mr. ELIZONDO. Yes, ma’am. No, they are involved in a lot. I
would rather let Lockheed Martin explain the different domains
that they are involved with. I am——
Ms. MACE. Uh-huh.
Mr. ELIZONDO [continuing]. Probably not authorized to discuss
that. But they are involved in a lot of different areas and domains.
Ms. MACE. Admiral, flight safety risks for our pilots, based on
what you have experienced and seen in your career?
Dr. GALLAUDET. They are extensive.
In the one exercise I referred to where I received the email that
was then deleted was, the pilots—and this is worth bringing out.
There are debunkers out there who have said the ‘‘Go Fast’’ video
was just a balloon. That was only one video that was released.
There were dozens of these encounters that pilots, friends of Ryan
Graves, who is in this room right here, witnessed and caused sig-
nificant safety concerns.
And to almost call out an exercise and shut it down, which is
very compressed and the carrier is getting ready for deployment
and the pilots have to get certified to land on a carrier, it is ex-
treme, to say the least.
Ms. MACE. All right.
I have two last questions.
Real quickly, Mr. Shellenberger, how do we get more whistle-
blowers to come forward?
Mr. SHELLENBERGER. Well, this hearing, you know, is very im-
portant. And, obviously, you know, I cannot encourage whistle-
blowers to obtain information, but I can guarantee that I will pro-
tect them and go to prison to protect their identities——
Ms. MACE. OK.
Mr. SHELLENBERGER [continuing]. If they come to me.
Ms. MACE. Yes, sir.
OK, my last question. The first hearing we had on this, I had
never been briefed on UAPs or what they were—biologics,
nonhuman, et cetera.
How would you define, each of you—my last question—how
would you define nonhuman biologics, nonhuman intelligence?
What are we actually talking about?
Admiral? And we will go down the line.
Dr. GALLAUDET. I do not think it is a stretch, when you look at
the diversity of life on this planet and the size of this universe, to
think that there would be more diverse, higher-order, nonhuman
intelligence throughout the universe, and that is probably what is
visiting us.

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 52 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.