Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth (hearing transcript)

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2024-11-13 · 52 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of a joint hearing held November 13, 2024 by two subcommittees of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, chaired by Rep. Nancy Mace. The witnesses were Tim Gallaudet, Luis Elizondo, Michael Shellenberger and Michael Gold. They addressed government secrecy, AARO's transparency, a Pentagon document on the alleged Immaculate Constellation program, threats to pilot safety, and UAP activity near nuclear and military sites. Members also discussed UAP disclosure legislation.

  • p. 4 …Burchett. * Report, Pentagon, ‘‘Immaculate Constellation’’; submitted by Rep. Mace. * Questions for the Record: to Mr. Elizondo…
  • p. 6 …Part of the transparency effort was legislation created in the Pentagon, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution…
  • p. 7 …But this is going to be the original document from the Pentagon about Immaculate Constellation that…
  • p. 16 …Currently, the White House, CIA, NASA, the Pentagon, Depart-
  • p. 18 …Government offi- cials who have told Congress that AARO and the Pentagon have broken the law…
  • p. 19 …Two of the three potential explanations are blacked out. The Pentagon, the intelligence community is treating…
  • p. 25 …And then, in 2009 timeframe, when I came back to the Pentagon after a tour with…
  • p. 42 …Pentagon, by the Department of Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review. And it states that…
  • p. 43 …bit when I was at the Pentagon. The problem is, the supposed collection of these biologi…
  • p. 44 …What I can say was, after a very thorough review process by the Pentagon, what I…
  • p. 46 …Are y’all aware of any task force at the Pentagon or in the national security…
  • p. 47 …And do you believe that there is a concerted effort by the Pentagon to keep Congress…
18
Dr. GALLAUDET. I can tell you that in a closed setting.
Ms. MACE. Can you describe what was depicted in the satellite
imagery, just a description?
Dr. GALLAUDET. It was a UAP, ma’am.
Ms. MACE. That is it? No other description?
Dr. GALLAUDET. The term that the analyst used, they call it the
button. It was a disc-shaped object.
Ms. MACE. OK. Where was it?
Dr. GALLAUDET. I cannot tell you that, ma’am.
Ms. MACE. OK.
All right. Mr. Elizondo, you state in your testimony that, quote,
‘‘Advanced technologies not by our government or any other govern-
ment are monitoring sensitive military installations around the
globe,’’ end quote.
If these technologies are not made by any government, who is
making them? Private companies? Or are you implying they are
crafted by a nonhuman intelligence?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Well, ma’am, that is precisely why we are here.
The problem is that, temporally speaking, over decades, not just
the last 10 years, before—to put this in perspective——
Ms. MACE. Are these private companies you are implying, or is
this nonhuman intelligence?
Mr. ELIZONDO. It may be both.
Ms. MACE. OK.
Mr. ELIZONDO. When it comes to Blue Force Technologies, I
would not be able to discuss——
Ms. MACE. OK.
Are you read into secret UAP crash retrieval programs?
Mr. ELIZONDO. We would have to have a conversation in a closed
session, ma’am. I signed documentation 3 years ago that restricts
my ability to discuss specifically crash retrievals.
I submitted for my book, through the DOPSR process, which took
a year for it to be reviewed, and what is in the book is what I was
told I am allowed to talk about.
Ms. MACE. Has the government conducted secret UAP crash re-
trieval programs? Yes or no?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Yes.
Ms. MACE. OK.
Were they designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft?
Yes or no?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Yes.
Ms. MACE. Does the U.S. Government have any reverse—OK.
You have already answered that question about retrieval programs.
Do any U.S. contractors have the same?
Mr. ELIZONDO. I would prefer to address that in a closed session,
ma’am.
Ms. MACE. OK.
In your book, you mentioned government employees who have
been injured by UAPs placed on leave and receiving government
compensation for their injuries. Is that correct?
Mr. ELIZONDO. That is correct.
Ms. MACE. How can the government deny we have recovered
craft if they are paying people because they have been injured by
recovered craft?

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 52 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.