Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth (hearing transcript)

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2024-11-13 · 52 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of a joint hearing held November 13, 2024 by two subcommittees of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, chaired by Rep. Nancy Mace. The witnesses were Tim Gallaudet, Luis Elizondo, Michael Shellenberger and Michael Gold. They addressed government secrecy, AARO's transparency, a Pentagon document on the alleged Immaculate Constellation program, threats to pilot safety, and UAP activity near nuclear and military sites. Members also discussed UAP disclosure legislation.

  • p. 6 …It is never easy to present such information publicly. So, I appre- ciate our witnesses voluntarily…
  • p. 14 …Moreover, the Commander of Fleet Forces Command and the operations officer never discussed the subject even…
  • p. 15 …Having never signed a nondisclosure agreement regarding UAPs and now, as a private citizen, I have…
  • p. 17 …In closing, we, as Americans, have never been afraid of a chal- lenge. In fact, we…
  • p. 20 …I have never seen anyone wearing an Office of Personnel Management T- shirt, which is why…
  • p. 21 …the chance to garner new knowledge, should never be ignored. We must be thorough in collecting…
  • p. 29 …I would never, ever try to endorse providing some sort of information that could compromise what…
  • p. 30 …Why do you think the Commander of Fleet Forces operations officer never discussed the incident again…
  • p. 32 …And let me just state for the record, I never read the report that—or the…
  • p. 35 …We could never do good science with that. And let me tell you, the NASA budget…
  • p. 39 …Commander of Fleet Forces and his operations officer never discussed the incident again. Is that accurate?
  • p. 40 …And even during weekly meetings, it was never dis- cussed again. My question for you is…
  • p. 42 …order to make that complete, and that never occurred. And so, when Secretary Mattis became Secretary…
  • p. 46 …The Earth is flat, birds are government drones, and we have never set foot on the…
  • p. 49 …The first hearing we had on this, I had never been briefed on UAPs or what…
18
Dr. GALLAUDET. I can tell you that in a closed setting.
Ms. MACE. Can you describe what was depicted in the satellite
imagery, just a description?
Dr. GALLAUDET. It was a UAP, ma’am.
Ms. MACE. That is it? No other description?
Dr. GALLAUDET. The term that the analyst used, they call it the
button. It was a disc-shaped object.
Ms. MACE. OK. Where was it?
Dr. GALLAUDET. I cannot tell you that, ma’am.
Ms. MACE. OK.
All right. Mr. Elizondo, you state in your testimony that, quote,
‘‘Advanced technologies not by our government or any other govern-
ment are monitoring sensitive military installations around the
globe,’’ end quote.
If these technologies are not made by any government, who is
making them? Private companies? Or are you implying they are
crafted by a nonhuman intelligence?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Well, ma’am, that is precisely why we are here.
The problem is that, temporally speaking, over decades, not just
the last 10 years, before—to put this in perspective——
Ms. MACE. Are these private companies you are implying, or is
this nonhuman intelligence?
Mr. ELIZONDO. It may be both.
Ms. MACE. OK.
Mr. ELIZONDO. When it comes to Blue Force Technologies, I
would not be able to discuss——
Ms. MACE. OK.
Are you read into secret UAP crash retrieval programs?
Mr. ELIZONDO. We would have to have a conversation in a closed
session, ma’am. I signed documentation 3 years ago that restricts
my ability to discuss specifically crash retrievals.
I submitted for my book, through the DOPSR process, which took
a year for it to be reviewed, and what is in the book is what I was
told I am allowed to talk about.
Ms. MACE. Has the government conducted secret UAP crash re-
trieval programs? Yes or no?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Yes.
Ms. MACE. OK.
Were they designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft?
Yes or no?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Yes.
Ms. MACE. Does the U.S. Government have any reverse—OK.
You have already answered that question about retrieval programs.
Do any U.S. contractors have the same?
Mr. ELIZONDO. I would prefer to address that in a closed session,
ma’am.
Ms. MACE. OK.
In your book, you mentioned government employees who have
been injured by UAPs placed on leave and receiving government
compensation for their injuries. Is that correct?
Mr. ELIZONDO. That is correct.
Ms. MACE. How can the government deny we have recovered
craft if they are paying people because they have been injured by
recovered craft?

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 52 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.