Documents / Hearing transcript

House Armed Services Committee hearing on UFOs, April 5, 1966

Internet Archive · 1966-04-05 · 37 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is an excerpt from the record of the April 5, 1966 House Armed Services Committee hearing on UFOs, which the Internet Archive holds. It includes correspondence about the September 3, 1965 Exeter, New Hampshire sighting involving Raymond E. Fowler, Project Blue Book and the Exeter police officers, plus a letter on the matter from Minority Leader Ford. Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Major Hector Quintanilla and Secretary Harold Brown testify. They say the police officers' observation remains unidentified and that no radar data or jet scrambles were involved.

6057
But Tinker AFB itself must have received dozens of calls during the heavy
sighting period of July 31 through August 5. This much is indicated by A
sentence sent out over the highway patrol network the night of August 2. "The
security officer at Tinker Field reports he has been swamped with calls the past
hour from people reporting UFO's." This report refers to just I hour of the
several-day sighting period.
Chances are, it is said, that the Air Force handling of the UFO problem may
be allowed to drag along by an apathetic public. Yet one may speculate on
what an honest and energetic Investigation might do. For one thing, It would
investigate some of the sightings reported by the Oklahoma highway patrol.
For Instance, take this report that moved with many others, over the teletype
August 4. "Twenty-five people at a church in Cushing, Okla., all watched
several UFO's. Sometimes they would stay stationary, then would move at a
high rate of speed. Were moving south for a while, then stopped and stood
still for some time, then were Joined by two and moved to the west at high
speeds, then turned and traveled east for a while, then stopped completely and
stood still, then went east and suddenly disappeared from sight. The first ones
were orange lights, the ones that joined them had red and green lights like
airplanes. PD (police department) Cushing also observed the same things."
Or the "approximately 30 calls" to the Shawnee Police Department reporting
4 or 5 lighted objects traveling northwest which "make no conventional noise
such as an aircraft does but rather make a humming noise." Or what did the
five citizens of Norman, Okla., see looking at a white globe 30-4'feet In diameter
through a "tripod-moubted 160-powet telescope."
The evidence is convincing that the Air Force--for reasons it doesn't an-
nounce-Is not really trying to discover what the UFO's are. Or, if the Air
Force already knows, it is painstakingly keeping its information from the public.
Chief blame for this lack of action must rest on the Government.
But another culprit, the scientific community, must bear blame according to
an August article by Robert 0. Cowen, natural science editor of the Christian
Science Monitor. He wrote in part:
"The main- reason there has been no scientific study of the (tiFO) puzzle is
social pressure within the scientific community. It has not been due to lack
of opportunity to gather data.
"Many scientists feel the whole subject Is 'kooky.' They dismiss it with
ridicule. It can be personally embarrassing, even detrimental to a scientist's
career, to try to take the saucer problem seriously."
It is time to investigate; scientific knowledge of some sort resides in the
UFO phenomenon, said the writer.
[From the Portland (Maine) Evening Express, Jan. 21, 1966]
THOSE "FLYING SAUCERS"-WHAT SHERIFFS SAW WASN'T STAB, UFO PROBER
ADMITS
(Editor's note: This is the fifth of a series about UFO's unidentifiedd flying
objects) by Bulkley S. Griffin, executive editor of the Evening Express, Wash-
ington bureali)
WASHINGTON, D.C.-The case of the two Texas deputy sheriffs whose patrol
car was allegedly followed by an unidentified flying object (UFO) so that they
hit 110 miles an hour In rushing away, Is worth mentioning for Its own sake in
any study of the Air Force-UFO confrontation.
The case also illustrates the possibility of a more realistic trend In Project Blue
Book-which Is the name of the Air Force's investigation of UFO's.
Project Blue Book first listed the Texas sighting as, "Refraction of Star
Antares distorted due to Inversion." This verdict was a highly improbable one
from the start, as will be seen from the testimony of the two deputy sheriffs.
Recently, MaJ. Hector Quintanflla, In command of Project Blue Book, stated he
has withdrawn' this conelusl6n after talking over the phone with Deputy Sheriff
McCoy. The star verdict didn't seem to fit. So Blue Book now records the sight-
ing as one of the very few unexplained ones on its rolls.
Another recent case of reconsideration of a verdict occurred in the instance of
the four lighted objects seen together by many observers thenilght of August 1-2,
according to the teletype reports of the Oklahoma Highway Patrol. The latter

Cases discussed

  • The Exeter Incident 1965
    Route 150 in Kensington, N.H., on September 3, 1965; Officers Bertrand and Hunt; regarded as unidentified

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 37 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.