Documents / Hearing transcript

House Armed Services Committee hearing on UFOs, April 5, 1966

Internet Archive · 1966-04-05 · 37 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is an excerpt from the record of the April 5, 1966 House Armed Services Committee hearing on UFOs, which the Internet Archive holds. It includes correspondence about the September 3, 1965 Exeter, New Hampshire sighting involving Raymond E. Fowler, Project Blue Book and the Exeter police officers, plus a letter on the matter from Minority Leader Ford. Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Major Hector Quintanilla and Secretary Harold Brown testify. They say the police officers' observation remains unidentified and that no radar data or jet scrambles were involved.

6056
group, who went to the scene to investigate for NICAP. The latter stands for
National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena, the unoffeal but re-
sponsible Washington organization. The Fowler charges are in the files of Blue
Book and of NICAP.
Fowler talked with witnesses and others and said he was told that Pease
AFB officers had asked the police and a local newspaper correspondent not
to mention the sightings. The request was put to the police on the ground
people would be alarmed It told the facts, it is stated.
Major Quintanilla, informed of this charge, said that "I would not allow any
suppression of news." However, it is an impression in Washington that officers
a good deal higher than Major Quintanilla would not exert themselves to prevent
news suppression of UFO sightings.
The Haverhill (Mass.) Gazette wrote an editorial on this UFO in the neigh-
borhood, in which it said: "So many have reported seeing it (the Exeter UFO)
and their descriptions Jibe so closely that, unless they have banded together
in one large hoax, their stories must be given credence."
[From the Portland (Maine) Evening Express, Jan. 20, 1966]
THOSE "FLYING SAUCERS"-Axi FoosE BRUSHES OFF FLOOD OF SIOIIINOs IN
SOUTHWEST
(Editor's note: This Is the fourth of a series about UFO's (Unidentified flying
objects) by Bulkley S. Griffin, executive editor of the Evening Express, Wash-
ington bureau.)
WASHINGTON, D.C.-A good 2 weeks after the flood of unidentified flying object
(UFO) sightings last August over Oklahoma and other Southwestern States,
Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma City, produced its formal survey aid Judg-
ment. It sent this several-page explanation of sightings in its wide area to
Project Blue Book, the Air Force office in charge of the UF'O Investigations and
conclusions.
This report Is a good example of Air Force anti-UFO 'propaganda. h1xcept
for mention of one specific sighting-which was decreed to be a weather baloon-
the report is generalized, pulling out all the stops on the possibilities of citizens
making mistakes and Including a statement from the official of a planetarium in
Oklahoma City whose text was that "the average person is uneducated as to what
the sky normally looks like."
Interviews with illitary experts are given which mention unusually bright
stars at this time of year. a haze that reflects things from the ground, the fre-
quency of weather balloons and so on.
An Impressive but superficial case is made for weather balloons as fooling
people into thinking they are seeing a UFO. The number released daily in the
Oklahoma area is considerable.
But the fact is that the citizens thereabouts have lived with these balloons day
after day and year after year and by now must be fairly well acquainted with
what they look like and how they act. They are also pretty well acquainted
with dtars, which at the moment may be supplanting balloons as the favorite
explanation put forth by Project Blue Book.
The Tinker AFIR report did not need to avoid mention of particular sightings.
The Oklthoma Highway Patrol teletype reported a number of sightings well worth
investigation and these teletype VUF. reports were relayed to all major news-
papers, wire services and TV and radio stations across the State of Oklahoma;
also to the weather wire teletype system. They were available to sincere Air
Force Investigators.
The failure to interview witnesses could be termed negative Air Force prop-
aganda. The highway patrol messages named close to a dozen civilian wit-
nesses usually with addresses, and the number of highway patrol officers that bad
sightings must have totaled two dozen and more. Yet the formal August 20 re-
port from Tinker shows Interviews with but two civilians and two police officers.
Maj. Hector Quintanilla, In command of Project Blue Book, says the Air
Force seeks interviews With persons who call up and whose names they learn.
"We are not interested in persons who go to the newspapers or to'radio and TV
stations," he said. The wisdom of this exclusion is of course wide open to ques-
tion-assuming that the Air Force is seeking information.

Cases discussed

  • The Exeter Incident 1965
    Route 150 in Kensington, N.H., on September 3, 1965; Officers Bertrand and Hunt; regarded as unidentified

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 37 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.