Documents / Report
This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated 12 January 2010, is one of a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) program. It reviews materials for launch vehicles, space vehicles and reusable rocket engines, including aluminum alloys, polymer and metal matrix composites, titanium and nickel alloys, ceramics and titanium aluminides. It concludes that newer materials and design methods offer many ways to improve structural efficiency and cost compared with the space shuttle.
UNCLASSIFIEDJ;roA 81iiFl&19'L lt81! e••L't design of a cryopump potentially can benefit from these new materials and from abandoning the use of notched strength as a design paradigm. The combustion chamber of a rocket engine is made from a copper alloy and is cooled by passing liquid hydrogen through channels in the outer wall. The space shuttle main engine combustion chamber is made of NARloy-Z, a Cu-3%Ag-0.5%Zr alloy that has excellent thermal conductivity and better strength than the commercially available Cu- 0.15%Zr alloy known as AMZIRC. While a lighter combustion chamber would be welcome, developing hydrogen-resistant turbine materials would be a much better use of available rocket engine alloy development resources. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS This document has attempted to review a range of materials that may have promise for all aspects of aerospace platforms. Because of the breadth of this topic, discussion has focused on opportunities and associated risks, but with little technical detail. Practical issues such as manufacturing capabilities and costs and the availability of materials also have been addressed where appropriate. Another recurring issue is the ability to achieve better design efficiency through a design synthesis process that concurrently treats form, fit and function, manufacturing capability, and materials capability as equally important design constraints. Although this approach has yet to be successfully used for a major high-performance structure project, engineering is nearing a state of development where it may now be feasible. If the space shuttle is used as a benchmark, it is clear that numerous opportunities will exist to improve structural efficiency. This possibility reflects the progress made since the shuttle and its engine were designed. Improved durability and reduced operating cost also are possible. The issue of long lead time holding back these improved design methods is most often one of timely availability of new, attractive materials that are mature enough to be used in a system without increasing the risk of failure. The materials community is actively developing and using computational models and simulation methods to address this concern. Despite some progress, further advances are required to bring computational materials engineering to the desired level of maturity. 1. Hatch, J. ed. Aluminum, Properties and Physical Metallurgy. American Society for Metals, 1984. 2. Chawla K. Composite Materials, Science and Engineering 2nd edition. Springer, 1998; 3. Baker, A., Dutton, s. and Kelly, D. Composite Materials for Aircra~ Structures 2nd edition. AIAA, 2002. 4. Lutjering, G and Williams, J. Titanium, 2nd edition. Springer, 2007, s. Sims, C. and Hagel, W. The Superalloys. Wiley, 1972. 6, Mishra, R. and Ma, z. Friction Stir Welding and Processing, Materlals Science and Engineering. v.so, pp. 1-78, 2005. 22 UNCLASSIFIEDJ/FOA 81iiliiiOit1ls -,91 8HLl
Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 27 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.