Documents / FOIA release
This is a report of investigation by the Central Intelligence Agency's Office of Inspector General, dated 18 July 2014. It covers Agency access to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staff files on RDINet, the network built for the Senate review of the rendition, detention and interrogation program. The report found that five Agency employees improperly accessed the SSCI Majority shared drive and that three IT staff lacked candor. It also found no factual basis for the CIA crimes report against SSCI staff.
Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.
# SECRET//NOFORN
SSCI on the RDINet $ ^{6} $ (Exhibit E). The report detailed that in the November 2010 timeframe, a member of the SSCI staff conducted a search on the RDINet that appeared intended to access a part of the system to which the member did not have authorized access.
## IV. (U) INVESTIGATIVE FINDINGS
## (U) Executive Summary of Investigative Findings
20. (U//FOUO) OIG investigation found support for allegations that CIA staff intentionally accessed the SSCI shared drive without authorization and exceeded authorized access. Additionally, three members of the RDINet IT team were not candid with OIG when interviewed and initially failed to disclose their recent investigative access to the SSCI shared drive. The investigation did not find support for the allegation that CIA performed real-time interception of SSCI communications for its review of the matter in question, however, CIA did review stored information that included (b)(3) and a review of some of the emails of SSCI Majority staff members on that network. The investigation found that D/CIA Brennan did not authorize the access or know the extent of the access, and OIG obtained conflicting testimony regarding whether or not D/CIA Brennan had any knowledge of a review performed on the SSCI shared drive (b)(3) until after it was completed. OIG investigation further found that the Director of Security authorized a review of the SSCI activities, including the reconstruction of the emails of SSCI staffers, following a stand-down order by the D/CIA and a request to withdraw authorization by the SSCI security officer. Finally, OIG investigation found that the CIA referral of criminal conduct by SSCI staffers was predicated on inaccurate information provided to the then-Acting General Counsel.
## (U) Absence of a Formal Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the Operation of RDINet
21. (U//FOUO) OIG did not find evidence that a final document was agreed upon by both the SSCI and CIA, nor any documentation that an agreement was signed by the CIA or the SSCI. OIG did find, however, that there was a common understanding reached between the CIA and the SSCI. Several letters between SSCI Chairman Feinstein, then SSCI Vice Chairman Bond, and then D/CIA Panetta were exchanged in 2009 that contained enough similar language to define a working agreement. The common understanding between the SSCI and CIA did contain language regarding a walled-off network shared drive for exclusive SSCI use, except when IT staff required access for maintenance or troubleshooting. In addition to the working agreement, the SSCI staff were provided a warning at each login that their "use of this system may be monitored and you have no expectation of privacy." OIG found that the (b)(3) installed at the outset of RDINet by CIC was connected in the normal course of
installed at the outset of RDINet by CIC was connected in the normal course of business and (b)(3) was collected in a manner consistent with the administration of
[6] (U) Pursuant to Section 1.6(b) of Executive Order 12333, as amended, and Sections VI.B, VII.A.4, and VIII.A of the 1995 Crimes Reporting Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of Justice and the Intelligence Community, the CIA is required to the report to the DOJ information concerning federal crimes. Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 57 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.