Documents / FOIA release
This is an internal Central Intelligence Agency newsletter, Information Review and Release (IRR) News, covering the week of 26 to 30 July 2004. It lists upcoming classification appeals panel meetings and recaps FOIA requests: one about the Lumumba murder, one questioning CIA electronic information gathering, and one on how the CIA defines operational files. It also reports a CREST-like system installed at the Ford Presidential Library and includes archive excerpts on Pope John Paul II's 1979 visit to Poland and on Soviet interrogation methods. It does not discuss UFOs.
Approved for Release: 2019/03/27 CO5578051 with no further trial or investigation, and the threat to persecute or arrest the prisoner's relatives... Added emphasis was fumished by the assurance that ‘the MGB can do anything—either shoot or free a criminal....The prisoner might be promised lighter treatment if he were quickly and frankly to admit his guilt....The promises, of course, were almost never fulfilled, but their effect on the prisoner was great. A not unimportant promise of the interrogator to the prisoner was food and cigarettes. This promise was fulfilled if the prisoner admitted his guilt or commenced to give truthful testimony." The use of physical force was officially prohibited [except] in very important cases where it was absolutely known that a prisoner was giving false information, especially in espionage cases. The chief of the section, with the verbal sanction of the chief of the directorate, assumed responsibility, and force was used on the prisoner; i.e., he was umnercifully beaten. V (U//H865 "All of the above-mentioned measures were designed to obtain a confession of guilt from the prisoner and to elicit a list of his accomplices. Exceptional insistence was placed on the delivery of accomplices...The appraisal of the work of the interrogator was determined by his unmasking of the prisoner and obtaining a confession of criminal activities, and by his obtaining from the prisoner a complete list of accomplices. This is why the interrogators...were so zealous in their demands on prisoners to name all persons who were also involved in criminal activity....The entire procedure was centered around the fact that the prisoner was unaware of the major role his admission would play, because in the absence of incriminating evidence, if he refused to confes he stood -‘ - ' ' ' s, a one in ten chance of being freed. Approved for Release: 2019/03/27 CO5578051 (b)(3
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 3 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.