Baker report, 1968 congressional hearings

Well, it is obvious they apparently don't have the ability to track, but the response was "No," everywhere except in South
Africa. Then they said, "anything we track, which we do not understand, we turn over to the Department of Defense,"
inferring there were some things they did not understand.
The same is true with those places in the world where there is a Baker-Nunn camera. I asked the same question of them.
For the most part there was a boundless curiosity, but a negative response.
Dr. Hynek. I might respond to that, of course, in talking to them, you have represented officialdom, and they may
themselves be a little afraid to say anything to a Congressman that might get them into trouble.
But I get reports sub rosa that are to the effect that people, trackers, and so forth, have seen things, but they would not dare
think of reporting it.
Now, that is hearsay. I am sorry it is not hearsay; it has happened to me.
But it is not what I would call "solid evidence,"
Mr. Roush. Just one other comment. I serve on the board of trustees of a college back in Indiana. In the course of a year
they had numerous lectures by outstanding people in their lecture series, quite outstanding people on various subjects, but
they scheduled one lecture given by a student at the college on unidentified flying objects. Needless to say, he had the best
attendance of the entire series.
Dr. Harder.
Dr. Harder. Following on something that Dr. Hynek said about the small percentage of actual sightings that are reported,
this would suggest that the two instances that I brought out, which to my knowledge are the only extant pieces of what you
might call scientific information -- information containing information of a scientific nature, might well be multiplied by a
factor of 10, if it were not for this ridicule bit, and furthermore, if it were not the subject of ridicule, many people would
perhaps take greater care in the observations that they do make, and perhaps come up with similar kinds of anecdotal
nature of somewhat more importance than just flashing lights.
For instance, the plane of polarization or -- well, many kinds of observations came to us. We would have even at this point
far more anecdotal information of a scientific nature and of scientific importance than we now have.
Mr. Roush. I think those of you who have sat on this panel today have made perhaps a greater contribution than you
realize in adding
[[195]]
some respectability to the interest the American people have in this phenomena. Perhaps we can, by further activity on the
part of this committee, and you on your part, and by the public reading what you have said today, cause people to be more
responsive and to report what they see. Perhaps we can thereby give an air of respectability to these sightings which will
permit people to go ahead without being embarrassed or ashamed of reporting what they have seen.
Does anyone else have anything here?
Mr. Fulton. Mr. Chairman, sightings of UFO's in western Pennsylvania have now increased to the point where interested
citizens have established a UFO Research Institute with a 24-hour answering service, to investigate reports and sightings.
In my congressional district, there is the Westinghouse astronuclear plant, whose fine work is well known to the members
of our committee. As I have been asked by Mr. Stanton T. Friedman, a nuclear physicist at Westinghouse who makes a
hobby of investigating UFO sightings and publicly speaking on the subject, it is a pleasure to insert a statement by Mr.
Friedman, "Flying Saucers Are Real" into the record at this point. He is one of the few observers with the candor to
conclude and so state that "the earth is being visited by intelligently controlled vehicles" from outer space.