Documents / Report

Air Force Project Blue Book Special Report 14 (Hynek's annotated copy)

Center for UFO Studies · 139 pages · text by OCR

This is the July 1966 third edition of Dr. Leon Davidson's "Flying Saucers: An Analysis of the Air Force Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14", published by Ramsey-Wallace Corp. It reproduces early Air Force press releases, the 1953 CIA panel report, the 1966 Blue Book release and the full text of the May 1955 Special Report No. 14 with its tables and codes. Davidson also gives his view that the CIA was responsible for much saucer publicity.

  • p. 7 …The project was established two years ago at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, Headquarters…
  • p. 24 …Leon Davidson 14 Soundview Avenue White Plains, New York PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE HEADQUARTERS AIR RESEARCH AND…
  • p. 41 …We made the full report available in the Information Offices of this Headquarters and in the…
  • p. 70 …C. (b) Outside the ZI, reports will be submitted direct to Director of Intelligence, Headquarters USAF…
  • p. 72 …examination and analysis. 9. Release of Facts. Headquarters USAF will release summaries of evaluated data which…
The following points should be carefully noted about these histograms:

(1) The negligible number of sightings when the sun is within $ 1 0^{\circ} $ of the zenith and nadir (angle of elevation of the sun $ = \pm 9 0^{\circ} $ ) of the observer is due to the fact that the southernmost latitude of the U. S. is greater than the declination of the sun at the summer solstice, so that it would be impossible for the sun to reach the zenith or nadir of any observer in the U. S. (where most of the sightings were made).

(2) The time of day at which a particular angle of elevation of the sun occurs does not remain fixed but varies from day to day. Consider, for example, the variation in sunrise and sunset times over the course of a year.

Thus, there are only two inferences to be made from this histogram: (1) the high peak of sightings soon after sunset, and (2) the lack of increase in the UNKNOWNS relative to the KNOWNS near either sunset or sunrise. This would seem to discount the possibility that atmospheric phenomena such as mock suns were the primary cause of the unknown reports, since such phenomena usually occur when the sun is near the horizon.

The Local Sun Time was computed as a step in the calculation of the angle of elevation of the sun. It is related to the hour angle by the equation: Local Sun Time (L.S.T.) = HA/15+12.00, where L.S.T. is in hours and HA in degrees.

The cards were grouped on the basis of L.S.T. in intervals of one hour, and the number of cards in each interval was counted. Again the UNKNOWNS were sorted out and similarly treated. Histograms were constructed with the results of these tabulations of OBJECT SIGHTINGS (Figure 41). Here, again, there is a peak in the early evening hours.

The cards were then broken up into seven groups on the basis of the angle of elevation of the sun, as follows:

Group 1 - Daylight sightings for which the sun was more than $ 1 0^{\circ} $ above the horizon.

Group 2 - Sunset sightings for which the sun was between $ 0^{\circ} $ and $ 1 0^{\circ} $ above the horizon.

Group 3 - Sunset sightings for which the sun was between $ 0^{\circ} $ and $ 1 0^{\circ} $ below the horizon.

Group 4 - Evening sightings for which the sun was between $ 1 0^{\circ} $ and $ 4 0^{\circ} $ below the horizon.

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 139 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.