UFOs and Related Subjects (Lynn Catoe, 1969)

Vallee, Jacques. The Menzel-Michel controversy. Flying saucer review, v. 10,
July-Aug, 1964: 4-6.
,
In answer te; Donald Menzel's attack on Aime Michel's claim that local
orthotenic alignments discovered during UFO sightings could be extended
to form great world circles, author discusses me!:hod used for computation
of great c!rcles as well as new indications about the statistical significance
of the linesp based on IBM computer data.
----- Recent developments in orthotenic research. Flying saucer review, v, 9,
Nov. -Dec. 1963: 3-6.
General outline of methods perfected for analyzing orthotenic alignments,
----- Towards a generalisation of orthoteny and its application to the North
African sightine,s. Flying saucer review, v. 8, Mar. -Apr. 1962: 3-7.
Apparent confirmation of orthoteny in UFO sightings in the Morocco-Algeria-
Tunisia area is reported.
The Warminster phenomenon. Flying saucer review, v. 11, July-Aug. 1965:
3, 9.
In a letter published in the Warminster Journal (June 4, 1965), amateur
geologist and naturalist David Holton wrote that recorded instances of
phenomenon consisting of pe:-sistent "whirrings," humming sounds, and
vibrations of several degrees of intensity were occurring at places which when
linked, formed "straight lines" on the map and that three of these lines
passed through Warminster (England) itself. He also told how a number of
witnesses to whom he had spoken about the noise also had fleeting glimpses
of a luminous object overhead.
PERC EPTIOT\!
Comella, Tom. UFO's: problems in perception, Fate, v. 12, Jan. 1959:
92-96.
Details are given of UFO sighting in Cleveland, Ohio, October 21, Hl55,
There were several witnesses.
Durham, Anthony and Keith Watkins. Visual perception of UF~s. Flying saucer
review, v. 13, May-June 1967: 27-29,
Fit1e details of the structure of the eye that may be relevant to the accuracy
of UFO reports are noted,
----- Visual perception of UFOs: Part II. Flying saucer review, v. 13, July-
Aug, 1967: 24-25,
135