Documents / Hearing transcript

Transcript of a Presentation by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, 1952

war.gov · 1952 · 19 pages · text from the file's own layer

This declassified transcript, released by the Office of the Under Secretary of War, records a March 1952 presentation by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt on the U.S. Air Force's reorganized UFO investigation. Ruppelt says that of about 800 cases reviewed, roughly 20 percent were good reports from reliable observers that stayed unexplained. He notes clusters of reports near Los Alamos, Albuquerque and Oak Ridge and describes the Lubbock lights and their photographs in detail. He also covers reporting directives, classification and the upcoming Life magazine article.

  • p. 14 …The, uh, headquarters had called in and hadn't explained anything. They just said, 'Get on…
  • p. 16 …There is a directive from Headquarters, USAF, that establishes a reporting procedure. Now, we felt for…
6
diameter, and judging the rate of closure, he assumes it's going at a very terrific speed. But we've
been able in some cases to actually show how that pilot was misled and that it was actually a
balloon. However, we don't, we don't try to say that everything was a balloon. In other words, if
a balloon was launched in the area, we try to definitely pin that down. We can get the time of
launch of the balloon, the rate of ascent, the winds aloft, we can plot out the path of that balloon
and plot out the pilot's path and show by various lines of sight how he actually did see the
balloon. In the past, it's been a practice to say, "Well, there was a balloon launched within 100
miles, consequently the pilot must have seen the balloon." We don't want to try that because it's,
well, we just want to have more proof before we say that it's a balloon. And the Air Force has
gotten into a lot of trouble in the past by very loosely tying up these balloons with the sightings.
We have some photographs of these objects that, we have quite a few photographs, I should say.
A lot of them are definitely either hoaxes or else they're flaws in the negative and the people that
have found this print have looked at it and said, "Ah, I took a picture of the sky and I didn't see
this flying saucer, although here's a picture of it," and they'll send it into us. It's not too difficult
to examine those under a microscope and find out that the image is due to an imperfection in the
negative. However, we have a few photographs that are very difficult to evaluate. This is one of
them right here. It was taken in Phoenix, Arizona, on the 7th of July, 1947. This has been hashed
around quite a bit, and there's a little bit of doubt as to the, whether or not this was purposely
faked, but we've never been able to prove it.
This picture is probably the most interesting one that we've ever received, mainly because we
went into the background of this thing a lot more. This was taken in Lubbock, Texas last
September. Now, this Lubbock case is probably the most interesting one, the whole case is the
most interesting one we've ever had. These five college professors from Texas Tech were sitting
out in the backyard one evening, in what was it, August, yes, August 25th, and they happened to
be discussing meteors and so they were sitting there looking up in the sky, and all of a sudden
this bunch of lights went over. And so one of them, they looked at each other and said, "What
was that?" Nobody seemed to know. And so, about a half an hour later, why they were still
discussing the lights and they said they wished that something like that would go over again, and
it did. So, for, well, altogether in a period of, I believe it was five or six nights, they observed 12
of these things that went over. Well, they assumed that it was some kind of a missile that the Air
Force had been developing, and being nosy, they thought they'd find out what this, well, they
reached this conclusion after they saw the first two, that they'd find out what these missiles were.
So they set up their own measuring, crude measuring systems. They were able to set up a, or
measure the angles on the houses and things in their backyards so they could tell the angle this
thing went through, and they timed it with a stopwatch. They also set up a baseline 90 degrees to
the path—and incidentally, these things always came over the same path and at roughly the same
time every night, so they knew about what was going on. They set up this baseline and got at
each end with two-way radios and some homemade, well, you might call them theodolites or
measuring, angle measuring devices, and tried to get an altitude. Well, they were unsuccessful on

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 19 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.