Documents / Document
This essay by investigative journalist Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell, titled "The UAP Puzzle: Anthropocentrism & Avoiding Strategic Surprise," is dated July 26, 2023, in Washington, D.C., and was entered into the House record by Rep. Burchett. Corbell argues that UAP are real and outperform military technology. He says the military reporting process is broken and that secrecy about alleged craft and bodies of non-human origin is unjustified. He calls for transparency, whistleblower disclosure, and 2024 NDAA legislation to help that process.
Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.
I suggest those stakeholders involved with UAP related holdings get ahead of it while the door is open for them to do so. Legislation submitted for the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act is poised to assist this process. ## UAP AND PROPER INTERROGATION The UAP puzzle is complex and manyfold in presentation - more than I suspect is commonly understood - and it will require a diversified and coordinated interrogation to yield practical and functional understanding. The UAP problem certainly presents us with scientific questions, as much as it does pose national security concerns. Possibly more importantly, this puzzle provides existential opportunities that humanity would be wise to collectively embrace together. To make progress from here, we must pursue knowledge about UAP from all angles of interest and in a coordinated effort towards discovery, understanding and transparent disclosure. Our scientific communities must fully engage in an earnest, integrated and open process of discovery. We must actively acquire (and demand) high-quality data sets on the issue for useful analysis of UAP evidence; much of which has already been acquired by our national defense based platforms and is in the possession of various Department of Defense related groups, hidden from the broader public and scientific community at this time. ## CENSORSHIP & JOURNALISM REGARDING UAP After spending decades studying the UAP phenomenon I have found myself in a privileged position of being trusted. How have I achieved this? By being trustworthy in my work. I hear from the public and also from legions of service-members who have fought for the very concept of democracy and what it means to be an American. Who have fought for our rights to live in America with freedom and transparency; to have a truly representative based government; to live and die for the cause of our collective freedom. The price of that freedom should be a commitment to transparency for those who bestow our representatives with the power to represent us. One of the aspects I hear most about from our frustrated service-members is how the recent attempts by our military to streamline and define the parameters of the UAP reporting process is still greatly undefined and ineffective. That the systems analysis and information flow of UAP encounters, engagements and sightings, are too often swept under the rug or ignored for reasons of stigma or careerism. Should a military pilot be unlucky enough to see a UAP, what can they expect? A debrief which then turns into an aggressive and confrontational interrogation where the threat of demotion is made abundantly clear.
Not linked to a story yet.
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 6 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.