Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 3 # THE ROSWELL REPORT # Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert Headquarters United States Air Force…
  • p. 8 Clinical Investigations and Life Sciences Division, Headquarters Air Force Medical Operating Agency, Bolling AFB, DC; John…
  • p. 25 …the disc had been "flown to higher headquarters." That same story also reported that a Roswell…
  • p. 27 …These locations include Fort Worth, Texas, the home of the Eighth Air Force Headquarters; possibly Sandia…
  • p. 61 # DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE MEMORANDUM FOR SAF/AA FROM: AF…
  • p. 65 …DuBose says officials at the Headquarters of the Eighth Air Force were directed to tell the…
  • p. 70 # DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC MEMORANDUM FOR SAF/AAZ…
  • p. 86 HEADQUARTERS 509TH BOMB GP (VH) ROSSELL AFFY AIR FIELD ROSSELL, NEW MEXICO GENERAL ORDERS) NUMBER 9…
  • p. 87 …Arner per Paragraph 3, Special Order, #139, Headquarters, Roswell Army Air Field, dated 18 July 1947…
  • p. 89 …Arner per paragraph 3, SO #139, Headquarters, this station, dated 18 July 1947. 1st Lt. Lewis…
  • p. 90 …Colonel Loberg, Headquarters, Eighth Air Force, arrived this date to coordinate with S-3 and check…
  • p. 91 …Boatright, Headquarters, Eighth Air Force, arrived to coordinate with Statistical Control on cost analysis. 16 July…
  • p. 110 # HEADQUARTERS, ARMY AIR FORCES WASHINGTON SUBJECT: Issuance of Orders ## TO: NND760168 Commanding General Air Material Command…
  • p. 119 …where we haven't squadron or group headquarters should take their people away. 1:55 P…
  • p. 131 …I did not make a report of this incident to my headquarters since I felt that…
  • p. 136 …700 CIC was the CIC Headquarters.
  • p. 137 …700 CIC was the Headquarters? SC: Yes, I don't think I even made a report…
  • p. 138 …I think this was taken at the Headquarters at Carswell. RW: Yeah, that's right. That…
  • p. 139 …I took it to 8th Air Force Headquarters, General Ramey was excited; they were going to…
  • p. 148 …I don't even want 700 CIC Headquarters to know we wasted our time on it…
  • p. 149 …And if anybody from headquarters CIC came in I'm positive they would have checked in…
  • p. 192 …I was assigned, believe it or not, to Headquarters, Air Force... I still have the Headquarters…
  • p. 230 …on the basis of orders out of Headquarters Army Air Force. Q: While you were operating…
  • p. 231 …These are the pictures taken in General Ramey's office, 8th Air Force Headquarters by a…
  • p. 246 …Then after I left the headquarters of ARDC in Baltimore, I spent four years at the…
  • p. 269 …debris be flown to Eighth Air Force Headquarters at Fort Worth AAF, TX, for his personal…
  • p. 278 …Andrews AAF was headquarters of the Army Air Forces Weather Service. It is also interesting to…
  • p. 306 …this local headquarters of the AMC under the Walton Laboratories group, who have headquarters at Red…
  • p. 325 HEADQUARTERS FITZWILLIAM FORWARD c/o Commander, Task Group 7.2 APO 187, c/o Postmaster San…
  • p. 327 …Reports of results were made to Headquarters FITZWILLIAM FORWARD and to AFMSW-1. Results of the…
  • p. 855 …Brady, all from Headquarters. Eighth Air Force, arrived here for a conference and inspecting and coordination…
  • p. 873 …Marcellus Duffy eliminated it and several others from the project when Headquarters U.S. Army Air…
from the desert set in, the balloon maintained an altitude of 9200 $ \pm 1 5 0 $ ft.

An explanation as to why the ballast release functioned at 9000 ft, although it was set to operate at 12,000 ft, is plain from the following data. The air in the diaphragm was sealed off on the dawn ascent at 12,000 ft, where the pressure was 657 mb and the temperature 9C. However, by the time the balloon passed through this level during the slow descent, the instrument temperature was 19C. This means that the pressure of the air trapped inside the diaphragm was higher than it was at time of seal-off.

For the ballast valve to function, the balloon had to descend to a pressure which would be greater by about 3 mb than the pressure of the trapped air at its now higher temperature. Of course, there was little ventilation past the instrument, and therefore the instrument temperature was about 25C above the ambient temperature after the sun had risen.

The automatic ballast valve operates when the volume inside the sealed diaphragm becomes slightly less than the volume at seal-off. Denoting the altitude at which it can operate by the subscript h, the pressure divided by the temperature at this altitude will equal the pressure at the seal-off altitude divided by the trapped-air temperature at the time of seal-off; in this case

$$
p _ {s} = 6 5 7 \mathrm {m b}
$$

$$
T _ {s} = 9 \mathrm {C} = 2 8 2 \mathrm {A}
$$

$$
T _ {h} = 3 9 \mathrm {C} = 3 1 2 \mathrm {A},
$$

where the subscript s refers to seal-off. Thus the pressure at altitude h is given by

$$
p _ {h} = p _ {s} T _ {h} / T _ {s} = 7 2 7 \mathrm {m b}.
$$

This pressure, at which ballast release will begin, corresponds to an altitude of 9000 ft, which is the observed altitude maintained by the balloon for nearly $ 4\frac{1}{2} $ hours, until the radiosonde tracking signal was lost.

The theodolite lost the balloon in clouds earlier and the airplane observer never succeeded in seeing it, so the balloon may have remained for a considerably longer period at this altitude. Eleven hours after beginning the ascent, the balloon was reported to have been seen over Albuquerque, New Mexico, and about 26 hours later a report was made from Pueblo, Colorado, which seemed to indicate that the balloon was still in the air at that time. The meteorological situation and wind data for that area at the time of flight support the contention that the latter observations were of the same balloon.

The next flight consisted of an assembly of various balloons, as follows:

One 15-ft diameter 0.008-inch polyethylene balloon, Six 7-ft diameter General Mills 0.001-inch polythene balloons,

Two 350-gm meteorological balloons for stadia measurements.

The single balloon had a measured diffusion loss of lift of 4 grams per hour. The General Mills balloons were observed to lose lift at the rate of about 100 grams per hour per balloon.

Three of the 7-ft balloons were inverted and deflated shortly after launching, due to differences in the rates of rise of the various balloons in the cluster. Therefore, the altitude reached was not high enough to effect seal-off. (It is for this reason that the minimum pressure switch was developed for use in later flights.)

Fig. 9 shows the elevation and plan views of the track of this flight. The train leveled off at 16,500 ft. The diffusion loss of lift of the remaining balloons was approximately 300 grams per hour. The ballast valve used had an unusually high rate of static leakage which had been measured before release and found to be 310 grams per hour. Thus fortuitously, the loss of lift was compensated by ballast leakage. This nearly

ALTITUDE (Thousands of Feet)

FIG. 6. Idealized time-altitude curves for various balloon-control systems.

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.