Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 15 …Ramey Col William H. Blanchard Maj Gen Clements McMullen Brig Gen Donald N. Yates Albert P…
  • p. 26 …Similarly, two authors, William L. Moore and Charles Berlitz, also engaged in research which led them…
  • p. 28 …The Roswell Incident (1980) by William Moore and Charles Berlitz; "Crashed Saucers: Evidence in Search of…
  • p. 174 …incident" (it was in about 1980 that William Moore contacted me and asked questions about balloons…
  • p. 182 …the books that have been written by William Moore, and Randall Schmidt, and others, a lot…
  • p. 227 …One thing I should mention is that after I had visited from William Moore around '80…
  • p. 664 …Elec. Engineering, Brooklyn Polytechnic & NYU Charles B. Moore Jr. Research Engineer Former weather equipment officer, Army…
  • p. 749 …Charles B. Moore, Project Engineer and James R. Smith, Project Meteorologist Approved by: William D. Murray…
385 Madison Ave.

New York 17, N. Y.

New York University College of Engineering Research Division University Heights New York 53, N. Y.

Attention: Mr. C. S. Schneider, Research Assistant

Dear Mr. Schneider:

This is in reply to your letter of April 17th.

It is true that at N.Y. Airspace Subcommittee Meeting #12, we advised you that the Phase II operations would be restricted to weather conditions in which the sky was clear of clouds below 20,000 feet and the visibility at least three miles at all altitudes up to and including 20,000 ft. However, it was indicated that these conditions were subject to concurrence and approval by the Washington Airspace Subcommittee.

In order to expedite final approval of this case, coordination was effected with the Washington Airspace Subcommittee immediately subsequent to our Meeting #12. It was revealed as a result of such coordination that the Washington Committee felt that the ceiling restriction was inadequate in the interests of air safety and required that a cloudless sky condition be specified.

This information was relayed to the members of the N.Y. Airspace Subcommittee and they in turn concurred with this amendment in the interest of air safety. The minutes of New York Meeting #12 were amended accordingly.

Yours very truly,

C. J. Stock Secretary, N. Y. Airspace Subcommittee

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.