Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by GLM-OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 39 …An advance ground team, led by Albert P. Cray, preceded the NYU group to Alamogordo Army…
  • p. 96 …OSI also developed an advanced Narcotics Investigations Course designed to teach the latest technics in combatting…
  • p. 174 …Dr Crary and Dr Peoples were the advance people and scientific monitors for our project. Dr…
  • p. 247 …Spilly was a consultant, and even in his advancing age he was still an enormous source…
  • p. 273 …the advance party of the balloon group arrived by B-17. $ ^{21} $ On May 29, the…
  • p. 617 …in advance of balloon release and a second notice will be filed at the time of…
  • p. 618 …Upon attaining the desired altitude, the auxiliary lifting balloons will be released from the main balloon…
  • p. 694 …in advance of balloon release and a second notice will be filed at the time of…
  • p. 695 (1) The type balloon to be used in this phase of the project will be a…

Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.

Mr. C. J. Stock, Secretary

New York Subcommittee on Air Space

385 Madison Avenue

New York 17, N. Y.

Reference: New York Meeting No.12 Subject No.26, New York Case #156

Dear Sir:

Receipt of the minutes of the above meeting are acknowledged with thanks. However, on reading them, a discrepancy was noted. We believe the weather conditions agreed upon for Phase 2 operations were not a cloudless sky, but no ceiling under 20,000 ft.

We realize that there might be occasions when the clouds present would not constitute a ceiling. Yet, due to chaotic or unstable sky conditions, our balloons might be considered an unseen hazard to aircraft.

It is therefore requested that we be permitted to fly these rapidly rising, high altitude balloons after obtaining clearance on days when there are no more than scattered clouds in thin layers up to 20,000 ft. and visibility greater than three miles.

This is an important point, as the phenomena which we hope to measure is not a frequent one and our chances to investigate the remote phenomena are markedly reduced if we have to wait for cloudless skies and the phenomena to coincide.

This would have been brought to your attention earlier. However, we are unable, until yesterday, to confirm our impressions with the representatives of the Army Air Forces who were present at the meeting.

Yours very truly,

C. S. Schneider Research Assistant

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.