Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 190 …Well, Boford was Navy, that was the Navy... Q: Like taking a Pi Ball reading now…
  • p. 191 …fabricate balloons for us. During that period we heard of the Navy project that was going…
  • p. 207 …But were any of those used as precursors to Mogul or... A: None whatsoever. That was…
  • p. 270 …Ewing had conducted considerable research for the Navy during World War II, studying, among other things…
  • p. 323 …f) Measurements of actual sound channel transmission using a small stratosphere balloon carrying sound receivers and…
  • p. 657 …At the present time this company cannot supply us with balloons until Navy clearance is obtained…
  • p. 693 …for six hours using a non-extensible envelope with the addition of a ballast valve to…
  • p. 704 …Met Gifford who has 90' sea rescue boat this project is planning to use. Stayed at…
  • p. 705 …Wyckoff, Hungerfield, Vaux and myself regarding Navy participation with us in Crossroads. Captain Kellogg of Weather…
  • p. 718 …Schneider up with O'Day to check use as NYU station. Alamoggrdo crew helped get helium…
dramatically demonstrated by its firing 50 seconds after release. Launching shocks caused the baroswitch pen-arm to fall off its shelf, completing contact prematurely. In later flights, a time delayswitch was placed in series with the baroswitch to prevent a recurrence of this action.

Flights 21, 22, 24, 26 and 27, although carrying altitude control devices, were flown to test gear for associated projects. Either no pressure reporting gear was carried or the data from modified gear proved unreliable. Hence few performance data charts are presented.

Flight 21, using a late-model General Mills 20 foot thin cell and an automatic ballast valve, is known to have lasted for ten hours, descending at Marietta, Oklahoma.

Flight 22, included an earlier model General Mills balloon with a high rate of gas leakage, and an automatic ballast valve. The ballast control kept the balloon aloft, but for only six hours.

Flight 24, including an automatic ballast valve, is believed to have maintained constant level, 1,000 feet, for 122 minutes. It stayed aloft for at least $ 3\frac{1}{2} $ hours, when transmission ceased. The time-altitude curve is shown in figure 51.

Flight 27 employed a fixed rate of leak rather than an automatic ballast valve. The manual control did not provide sufficient ballast flow, accounting for the time-altitude curve shown in figure 52.

Flights 29 through 37 and flight 39 were undertaken to test the downwind launching procedure, to try for higher constant level altitudes, and to determine the feasibility of using the General Mills thin cells for frequent service flights. Flights 37 and 39 burst early. The former was released during a rainstorm and balloon failure occured at the seams.

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.