Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 15 …Ramey Col William H. Blanchard Maj Gen Clements McMullen Brig Gen Donald N. Yates Albert P…
  • p. 26 …Similarly, two authors, William L. Moore and Charles Berlitz, also engaged in research which led them…
  • p. 28 …The Roswell Incident (1980) by William Moore and Charles Berlitz; "Crashed Saucers: Evidence in Search of…
  • p. 174 …incident" (it was in about 1980 that William Moore contacted me and asked questions about balloons…
  • p. 182 …the books that have been written by William Moore, and Randall Schmidt, and others, a lot…
  • p. 227 …One thing I should mention is that after I had visited from William Moore around '80…
  • p. 664 …Elec. Engineering, Brooklyn Polytechnic & NYU Charles B. Moore Jr. Research Engineer Former weather equipment officer, Army…
  • p. 749 …Charles B. Moore, Project Engineer and James R. Smith, Project Meteorologist Approved by: William D. Murray…
during the sunset descent (caused when the superheated helium lost the sun's heating effect). A further descent of 5 mb (500 feet at this level) was required to start the flow of ballast. By this time, the balloon had lost considerable lift and in exchange had acquired a downward velocity of about 120 feet per minute. To check this descent a ballast flow was required for about 40 minutes. During the next hour the balloon was buoyant and climbing back to the seal-off pressure of the automatic ballast valve. The inefficiency of this valve system is demonstrated by the ballast which was lost after the balloon had regained its buoyancy and had begun to rise. More ballast was wasted than was required to check the descent. Indeed, the entire 3000 grams available was expended at this time, according to the evidence of the ballast meter.

On this flight there was no apparent change in the activation pressure of the automatic ballast aneroid between the times when ballast flow began and ended. This indicates that the entrapped air had not experienced any significant temperature change during the two hours of ballast operation.

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.