Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 8 …David Thurston, Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Office; Dr. Saxson and Betsy Hudon of…
  • p. 30 …XOW, Directorate of Weather (g) added later The Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) In…
  • p. 68 …Ruppelt was the UFO study project officer from 1951-1953 and he investigated a series of…
  • p. 95 …These records contain documents on investigative policy and Air Force Office of Special Investigation reports of…
  • p. 262 …of criminal activity which may require investigative action by commanders, supervisor, security police, AFOSI special agents…
  • p. 263 …Rogan who advised me, he was assisting in an investigation at the behest of the Secretary…
  • p. 314 …Lt Colonel Maas was assigned as Base Weather Officer and as head of the E&A…
## Flight 89: Released from Alamogordo, New Mexico, 1005 MST, August 26, 1948 Not recovered

On this flight a .001", 20-foot polyethylene balloon was used to carry a ballast meter to about 45,000 feet to determine the ballast requirements at that altitude, using an automatic ballast valve. No record of ballast flow was telemetered during this flight, but it is not known whether the ballast meter was inoperative or the ballast valve itself failed--possibly due to failure of a squib to detonate at the combined low pressure and cold temperatures aloft.

From the height-time curve, Figure 39, it will be noted that the balloon was in a near floating condition for about five hours after reaching its maximum altitude. The total weight available on this flight was 2 kg, so a loss of 400 grams per hour would have been required if the ballast was used during this period.

From Flights 70 and 71 we know that a balloon has remained for about four hours at slightly higher altitudes with no ballast flow to support it; Flight 89, therefore, is not necessarily an example of the action of the automatic ballast valve control.

Figure 39

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.