Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 39 …An advance ground team, led by Albert P. Cray, preceded the NYU group to Alamogordo Army…
  • p. 96 …OSI also developed an advanced Narcotics Investigations Course designed to teach the latest technics in combatting…
  • p. 174 …Dr Crary and Dr Peoples were the advance people and scientific monitors for our project. Dr…
  • p. 247 …Spilly was a consultant, and even in his advancing age he was still an enormous source…
  • p. 273 …the advance party of the balloon group arrived by B-17. $ ^{21} $ On May 29, the…
  • p. 617 …in advance of balloon release and a second notice will be filed at the time of…
  • p. 618 …Upon attaining the desired altitude, the auxiliary lifting balloons will be released from the main balloon…
  • p. 694 …in advance of balloon release and a second notice will be filed at the time of…
  • p. 695 (1) The type balloon to be used in this phase of the project will be a…
in high altitudes, since it freezes below -80 $ ^{\circ} \mathrm{C} $ and will flow readily at low temperatures. Also, this fluid will absorb only a very slight amount of water which might freeze aloft.

Basically three different principles have been used in the control of ballast flow. The first of these is calculated constant flow; the second is displacement-switch control; and the third is rate-of-ascent switch control.

## (1) Constant Flow

In the simplest of the control systems, liquid ballast is allowed to flow continuously through an orifice (Figure 8) at a predetermined rate. This rate is set to slightly exceed the expected loss of lift of the balloon due to leakage and diffusion. If this method is successfully used, the balloon stays full because the gas remaining in it has less load to support. Therefore, the balloon will rise slowly as ballast is dropped, maintaining equilibrium between the buoyancy and the load. In the General Mills 20-foot balloon, for example, diffusion losses are about 200 grams per hour at altitudes near 40,000 feet. The balloon at its ceiling of 40,000 feet with a 26-kilogram payload rises about 700 feet with each kilogram of ballast dropped. This means that such a balloon using this constant-flow type control will float at a "ceiling" which rises at the rate of about 140 feet per hour. Constant flow was first obtained by use of the manual ballast valve shown in Figure 9. Due to excessive clogging of this valve, caused by its annular ring opening, gate-type valves were tested, and finally the use of

Figure 8. Orifice for fixed-rate ballast flow.

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.