Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 26 …Since 1978-1980, other UFO researchers, most notably Donald Schmitt and Kevin Randle, claim to have…
  • p. 28 …Randle and Donald Schmitt; The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell (1994), also by Randle…
  • p. 131 …I have reviewed the pictures in the 1991 Book by Randle and Schmitt on the UFO…
  • p. 139 …It had been alleged in a number of books, including the one by Randle and Schmitt…
  • p. 141 …I went through and pulled out wherever, in this book UFO Crash at Roswell by Randle…
  • p. 142 …From the very start, when these clowns started hounding me, Randle and Schmitt, I told they…
  • p. 147 …He makes a number of claims that, at least Randle and Schmitt; and when I say…
  • p. 149 …risk injury to civilians on the ground. Randle asked if he remembered any talk at all…
  • p. 161 …Well, of course, Randle and Schmitt do claim that those people are out there and that…
  • p. 162 …Well, I got a perfect example of this with Randle and Schmitt. Randle is the outgoing…
  • p. 173 …On review of the photos in the Randle/Schmitt book, the material looks like one of…
It is impossible to make really detailed calculations of the maximum range without better information about temperature and sound velocity in locations from 45,000 to 90,000 feet, for it is there that the greatest frictional losses will occur. However, it is safe to predict that a bomb containing a few pounds of TNT can be heard from 4000 to 5000 miles. The chance that it could be heard to the farthest point on earth is worth consideration.

IV PROPOSED MILITARY USE OF ATMOSPHERIC SOUND CHANNEL

It is my belief that a large rocket or jet propulsion motor passing the axis of the sound channel would also be detectable by listening at several thousand miles, and subject to location by triangulation if heard by three suitably chosen stations. In time of war this triangulation could locate the launching sites of the enemy, and in peace time it is conceivable that suitably chosen listening stations could monitor the entire world to detect and locate any unusual rocket or jet propulsion experiments, thus minimizing the danger of surprise attacks with secret weapons.

## V TYPES OF LISTENING STATION

The most promising types of listening station according to my present knowledge would make use either of the higher mountains of the world or of free balloons to gain adequate height. It is unknown at present by how far the receiver may be removed from the preferred height without prohibitive sacrifice of sound channel properties. However, in the submarine sound channel we have had fairly good reception with the hydrophone at 2000 feet when the axis of the channel was at 4000 feet. Hence, it is not beyond reason that the taller mountains might provide sufficient altitude of themselves.

Small stratosphere balloons provided with radio means for transmission of sound impulses to a receiving station either fixed or mobile, probably provide the most readily available listening arrangement.

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.