Documents / Report

The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert

USAF / The Black Vault · 1995 · 882 pages · text by OCR

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published by Headquarters United States Air Force in 1995. The Black Vault distributes this copy. It reproduces the report by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the synopsis by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, both written after a General Accounting Office inquiry requested by Representative Steven Schiff. The Air Force search found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concluded that the Roswell debris most likely came from NYU Flight No. 4, a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 28 …Evidence in Search of Proof" (1985) by Moore; The UFO Crash at Roswell (1991) by Kevin…
  • p. 33 …There were no ancillary records in Air Force files to indicate the potential existence of such…
  • p. 66 …All of this organization's UFO study files were transferred to the National Archives and made…
  • p. 68 …These primary documents should have been part of this organization's UFO study files and currently…
  • p. 81 …On 2 March 1994, Inquiries Branch staff developed a list of possible file locations which might…
  • p. 83 …ROSWELL UFO UFOS UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS WEATHER BALLOON WEATHER BALLOONS The IRIS search produced no documents…
  • p. 95 …These files contain policy guidance and AFOSI District reports of investigation concerning UFOs (filed primarily by…
  • p. 96 …These phenomena, later termed unidentified flying objects or UFOs, had been sighted with some frequency in…
  • p. 237 …He appeared to want to substantiate the existence of the UFO incident as a UFO. I…
"Excluded are those two tests' special gear in launches which were not successful."

A: Right.

Q: So the special gear that's referred to here is the microphone gear?

A: Yes, sir.

Q: There's another passage that talks about the intelligence gear. Was that considered also...

A: Did we make such a faux pas as that?

Q: It's in there.

Q: I have the classification letter from July of '46. You might want to review this. Maybe your friend has shown that to you.

## A: No, I've never seen this.

Trakowski argued that even the name Mogul was classified, and he said it had the same classification as the Manhattan Project had, which surprises me, because in various reports that Todd has sent me, such as the monthly progress reports from the people at later Holloman Air Force Base, Mogul appears in things that are no higher classification than confidential, but Trakowski insists that Mogul was super classified.

## (END OF SIDE)

Q: This is a copy of the letter you wrote to Colonel Weaver. One of the things that you talk about in this letter was that the radar test flights were not reported, which is exactly what we were discussing a moment ago in your kitchen. Would you go over again what you just described as far as this particular test flight that occurred? What we just went through in there.

A: As I said initially, the essence in trying to develop constant level balloons, we needed to know what the altitude was. At the same time, we were under a lot of pressure to carry the test microphones for the Watson Laboratory and Columbia people. We got into an operation at Alamagordo in early June of 1947, in which we were required to make flights in which the tracking of the flights would be provided by the Watson Laboratory Radar that was already in place at Alamagordo for tracking the V-2s and other rockets the Ordnance Corps people were flying over at White Sands. So we came down to fly balloons in early June, in which the tracking of the flights was to be done by radar, tracking corner reflector targets, which I think we brought with us. I don't have any evidence of this.

Cited by

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 882 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.