Documents / Hearing transcript

The Mission, Activities, Oversight, and Budget of the All - Domain Anomaly Resolution Office

U.S. Senate · 2023-04-19 · 26 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of an April 19, 2023 hearing of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, chaired by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. AARO Director Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick testified on the office's mission, budget, data collection and review of the historical record. He said AARO had found no credible evidence of extraterrestrial activity or off-world technology. He also presented trend data and two declassified MQ-9 videos, and one of them was resolved as a commuter aircraft.

14
and 2021, 11 near misses occurred involving UAPs that required
pilot action and followup reports.
As a result, in 2019, the Navy established a protocol for pilots
to report on their dangerous encounters. Could you speak to any
ongoing efforts within DOD to ensure the safety of our aviators
with a potential UAP encounter, what is your relationship with
NORTHCOM, NORAD, SPACECOM when it comes to this imme-
diate real-time response and how—they are there right there in the
moment, right?
Dr. KIRKPATRICK. Absolutely. That is a great question.
Let me start with my relationship with the commands are very
good. I just came back from sitting down with General VanHerck
and all the all the J staff out at NORTHCOM a couple weeks ago,
talking through exactly what we need to do to help them get their
arms around this.
We are also working very closely with the Joint Staff, and the
Joint Staff has just been very outstanding in helping work through
policy and guidance issues to the forces and to the services. I would
like to just make sure that we message back to all of the operators
the importance of their reporting and the fact that you are about
to get a bunch of new requirements that we are issuing through
the Joint Staff on all of the data that we are going to need you to
save and report back to us.
It is invaluable and we are working to try to take the most ad-
vantage of that to learn what it is that we are trying to mitigate.
To get directly to your question, the first thing that we are doing
is normalizing our reporting. We are standardizing our reporting
and the requirements associated with that.
Guidance from the Joint Staff, I think, goes out maybe this week,
maybe next week, that we have been working with them for some
months that does exactly what I just said. It gives them timelines.
It gives them requirements. It gives them ‘‘here is all the data you
have to have, and you have got to retain it.’’
The next thing that comes after that is a plan ord that will go
out to the commands for mitigation and response. So there is a cou-
ple of things that we have to do.
One, I need to work with the commands and with the IC and out-
side of our DOD and IC partners to extend our collection posture
targeted at some of these key areas that you saw on that heat map
that have a lot of activity so that we can turn on extra collection
when an operator sees something.
Part of this is generating as a response function in what we call
a tactic technique and procedure for an operator when he sees
something, calls back to the operations floor. They can turn on ad-
ditional collection. What does that collection look like? How do I
bring all that together so I can get more data on what is that
thing?
Senator ROSEN. Can I ask really quickly——
Dr. KIRKPATRICK. Sure.
Senator ROSEN.—do you have the authorities you need to extend
your collection posture between agencies or branches of the mili-
tary? That seems to me to maybe be a sticking point. I know my
time is just about up.

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 26 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.