The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
material development in the period 1919-39will indicate how much
of the energies of the Air Corps was devoted to the search for a long-
range heavy bomber and how intimately that effort was tied to the
organizational and doctrinal issues which have just been described.
Evolution of the Long-Range Bomber
The Air Service emerged from World War I with a keen sense of
its responsibility for a solution to the related problems of what the
most effective air weapon might be and how that weapon should be
utilized. Perhaps it was the novelty of the air weapon itself and the
realization of its rapid rate of obsolescence that gave to the small group
of airmen who remained with the service a fresher approach than was
common in America’s peacetime military establishment. Perhaps it
was the impetus provided by a wartime experimental program which
bore its chief fruit after, rather than before, the termination of hostili-
ties. Perhaps, too, an additional spur to action came from the airman’s
desire to prove his case in the face of official disinclination to admit
the validity of his claims. At any rate, appropriations by the Air
Service for research and development during the three fiscal years
immediately following the war were higher than at any time there-
after prior to 1936. Indeed, they continued through the fiscal year
1926 to represent a greater percentage of the funds annually appro-
priated for the Air Service than would be allotted to these purposes
in any of the subsequent years.152
The figures taken alone are none too impressive: four and a half
million for 1920,just under six million for 192I , just over four million
for 1922, and a straight three million for 1924.But these sums acquire
significance when considered with the fact that direct cash appro-
priations for support of the Air Service had fallen precipitously from
the wartime peak of 952 million for the fiscal year 1919 to the round
figure of twenty-eight million for 1920.” Four years later the total
had been pared to twelve and a half million, and for the fiscal year
immediately preceding passage of the Air Corps Act of 1926 appro-
priations amounted to less than sixteen million.*53Thus in 1924 the
Air Service’s allotment for research and development represented
nearly 2 5 per cent of its total appropriation for that fiscal year.
These first postwar years-years of the initial struggle for recogni-
* The figures include only “direct” appropriations and omit sums expended by such
services as the Quartermaster and Finance for the benefit of Army aviation,
54