Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
N O T E S T O P A G E S 6 0 1 - 1 0
(Fortress I) Bombing Operations, I z
Sept. 1941.
198. Report of Interview with Maj.
E.P. Mechling, 7 Oct. 1941.
199. Brandt, as in n. 194.
zoo. A Sperry employee reported
that bombardiers had dropped fewer
than twenty-five practice bombs. (Ltr.,
Arnold to Air Attachk, London, Combat
Employment of B-17 Airplanes, I Oct.
1941.)
201. CM, London to C/AAF, 24 July
‘941.
202. Summary of B - I ~ ’ s ,as in n. 197.
203. Arnold to Air Attachk, as in n.
zoo; and 1 s t ind., Military Air Attachk to
Arnold, 16 Oct. 1941.
204. CM-664, London to AGWAR,
205. Memo for C/AS, Notes on a
Conference with T w o British Fighter
Pilots and T w o British Bomber Pilots, 26
206. CM-303, Chaney to AGWAR,
24 Dec. 1941.
207. Memo for C/AS from AC/AS,
A-3, Notes on a Conference with British
Pilots, 2 Jan. 1942.
208. Memo for Gen. Raymond E. Lee
from Chaney, Comments on Analysis of
Bomb Damage to Key Points, 5 Sept.
194’1.
209. CM-70, Arnold to Chaney, 6
2 1 0 . Memo for Col. George from
Maj. S.E. Anderson, Research Regarding
Bomber-Fighter Combats in Europe, 1 5
211. Memo for C/AAF from AWPD,
Equipment Necessary for Daylight Pene-
tration, 23 Oct. 1941.
212. Arnold had suggested the devel-
opment of a multi-seat fighter in 1934.
(Ltr., Lt. Col. H.H. Arnold to C/AC,
26 Nov. 1934.) For an explanation of
British failure to develop a long-range
fighter, see interview with Air Marshal
Sir Roderick Hill, 14 Sept. 1944.
213. Giulio Douhet, Command of the
214. AWPD/I, Tab 3.
I 1 OCt. 1942.
NOV.1941.
O C t . 1941.
O C t . 1941.
Air, pp. 3 3 7 f f .
215. Col. Ira C. Eaker to C/AAF,
Report on Trip to England, 3 0 Aug.-1
2 16. Requirements for Destroyer
Escort Plane, 8 Aug. 1942.
217. Report, Bombing A c c u r a c y
Board (F.L. Anderson, H.G. Mont-
gomery, Edward Flanick), z Jan. 1942.
OCt. 1941.
218. lbid.
219. Memo for C/AS from George,
t o Jan. 1942.
2 2 0 . Memo for C/AS from Arnold,
Creation of Bombardment Tactical Corn-
mittee, 26 Feb. 1941.
221. Ltr., Arnold to Eaker, Initial
Directive to Bomber Commander in Eng-
land, 3 1 Jan. 1942.
2 2 2 . Eaker, Plan for Bomber Com-
mand and Constitucnt Units to Arrive in
UK 1942, 2 0 Mar. 1942.
z z j . AWPD Division Digest, 2 1 Apr.
‘941.
224. Directive for Eighth Air Force
from Gem Eisenhower, z I July 1942.
225. VIII Bombcr Coinniand Diary, I
Aug. 1942.
226. CAI-OUT-519 ( z - I z - ~ z ) , Arnold
to Chaney, AF 2/207, 1 2 Feb. 1942; His-
tory, Eighth Air Force, I, 7.
2 2 7 . Like most such documents, this
directive exists in several successive
forms. Those consulted here are in File
706 and in History of the VIlI USA-
AF Fighter Command, chap. iii, pp. 49-
5 ’ .
228. Ltr., Eaker to Harris, 30 July
1942.
229. Ltr., Harris to Eaker, 3 1 July
1942. According to a competent British
source, “the US. and British views on
the possibilities of bombing Germany by
day had been reconciled” by the end of
March 1942. (See Anglo-American Air
Collaboration: Information requested by
Professor Hopper from Air Ministry
Historical Branch.) This document, which
came to this author’s hand too late to
consult for earlier chapters, has much
material concerning early strategic and
air plans.
230. New York Times, I I and 16
Aug. 1942.
7 3 7

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.