Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
N O T E S T O P A G E S 5 9 3 - 6 0 1
Attach6 for Air to SPENAVO, 30 Sept.
‘941.
158. CM-1965 (2-15-42), MA, Lon-
don to Washington.
159. Ltrs., Eaker to Arnold, 14 Apr.
1941; Arnold to Eaker, 9 Aug. 1941.
160. Quoted in Charles Ead,. comp.,
Winston Churchill’s Secret Session
Speeches (New York, 1946), p. 85.
161. Larner report, as in n. 1 5 5 .
162. Note by Air Marshal Sir Arthur
Harris on the Role and Work of Bomber
Command, WP (42) 374, 24 Aug. 1942.
163. Ltr., Harris to Arnold, 14 Aug.
’942.
164. lbid.
165. J.B. No. 3 2 5 (Serial 7 q ) , JB to
SPENAVO and SPOBS, Comments on
General Strategy Review by British
Chiefs of Staff, 25 Sept. 1941, par. 9.
166. CM-WW707, AIRWHIT to
RAFDEL, personal, C/AS to Harris, 1 2
Feb. 1942; memo for CNO from Comdr.
Forest Sherman, British Air Programme,
18 Aug. 1941; CM-216, London to T A G ,
6 Dec. 1941; CM-CRO61, SPENAVO to
167. Memo for S / W from R.A.
Lovett, AS/W, G-2 Report of Adm.
Ghormley’s Estimate of Bombers as
Offensive Weapons, 17 Nov. 1941 (re
Ghormley’s memo of 14 Nov.).
168. Zbid.; memo for C/AS from
AWPD, Comments on Attached Memo
re Lessons from British Air Offensive, 18
169. Ltr., Eaker to Chaney, 26 Apr.
170. File 706, 26 June 1942.
171. See message to the effect that
bombing was being seriously diverted to
the Battle of the Atlantic by order of
Churchill and against the judgment of
the RAF. (CM, Lee to W D , 18 Apr.
1941.) Cf. WP (42) 374 as cited in note
162 above, in which Harris states that
between April 1941 and March 1942 50%
of Bomber Command’s operations were
against maritime targets.
1 7 2 . General Strategy, par. 3 0 . Cf.
British rejoinder to JB comments on
same in AL (41) 8th Mtg., W a r Cabinet,
C/AC, 29 NOV.1941.
NOV.1941.
‘942.
7 36
American Liaison, Z I Nov. 1941, An-
nex A.
173. General Strategy, par. 30.
174. Bombers’ Battle, by a Wing
Commander (London, 19431, pp. 197-
175. AL (41) 8th Mtg., 2 1 Nov. 1941,
176. Bombers’ Battle, pp. 201-9.
177. H.A. Toulmin, Jr., Air Service,
A.E.F., 1918, chap. xv.
178. William Mitchell, Winged De-
fense, p. 16; Air Service Tactical School,
Bombardment (Washington, 1926), p. 62.
179. ASTS, Bombardment, p. 6; ltr.,
Follett Bradley to Col. W.J. Paul, 10
180. ASTS, Bombardment, p. 6 2 .
181. Ltr., Brig. Gen. H.S. Hansel1 to
author, 24 Feb. 1947.
182. Isaac Don Levine, Mitchell,
Pioneer of Air Power, p. 151; ASTS,
Bombardment, p. 54.
183. Memo for Col. W.J. Paul from
Dr. Chauncey E. Sanders, Relationship
of the Development of AAF Bombing
Doctrine to the Development of the
Modern Bombsight, 10 Mar. 1947.
200.
Annex A.
Apr. ‘947.
184. lbid.
185.Zbid.
186. lbid.
187. AWPD/I, Tab I , par. 5 .
188. lbid.
189. Ibid., par. 6.
190. Zbid., Tab 3 .
191. E.g., Aeroplane, 16 May; I Aug.;
2 2 Aug. 1941.
192. Ltr., Harris to Arnold, z July
‘944.’.
193. Zbid. Cf. CM, London, Harmon
to Arnold, I May 1942.
194. Spaatz Staff Meeting, 10 Sept.
1941, Talk by Brandt on Use of B-17 by
RAF.
195. CM, Lee to W D , 9 July 1942;
CM-57, Chaney to T A G , 2 2 July 1942.
196. Brandt, as in n. 194. Bombers‘
Battle, p. 139, puts this as the first B-17
mission.
197. OCAC, Summary of B-17’s

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.