Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
N O T E S T O P A G E S 5 9 3 - 6 0 1
Attach6 for Air to SPENAVO, 30 Sept.
‘941.
158. CM-1965 (2-15-42), MA, Lon-
don to Washington.
159. Ltrs., Eaker to Arnold, 14 Apr.
1941; Arnold to Eaker, 9 Aug. 1941.
160. Quoted in Charles Ead,. comp.,
Winston Churchill’s Secret Session
Speeches (New York, 1946), p. 85.
161. Larner report, as in n. 1 5 5 .
162. Note by Air Marshal Sir Arthur
Harris on the Role and Work of Bomber
Command, WP (42) 374, 24 Aug. 1942.
163. Ltr., Harris to Arnold, 14 Aug.
’942.
164. lbid.
165. J.B. No. 3 2 5 (Serial 7 q ) , JB to
SPENAVO and SPOBS, Comments on
General Strategy Review by British
Chiefs of Staff, 25 Sept. 1941, par. 9.
166. CM-WW707, AIRWHIT to
RAFDEL, personal, C/AS to Harris, 1 2
Feb. 1942; memo for CNO from Comdr.
Forest Sherman, British Air Programme,
18 Aug. 1941; CM-216, London to T A G ,
6 Dec. 1941; CM-CRO61, SPENAVO to
167. Memo for S / W from R.A.
Lovett, AS/W, G-2 Report of Adm.
Ghormley’s Estimate of Bombers as
Offensive Weapons, 17 Nov. 1941 (re
Ghormley’s memo of 14 Nov.).
168. Zbid.; memo for C/AS from
AWPD, Comments on Attached Memo
re Lessons from British Air Offensive, 18
169. Ltr., Eaker to Chaney, 26 Apr.
170. File 706, 26 June 1942.
171. See message to the effect that
bombing was being seriously diverted to
the Battle of the Atlantic by order of
Churchill and against the judgment of
the RAF. (CM, Lee to W D , 18 Apr.
1941.) Cf. WP (42) 374 as cited in note
162 above, in which Harris states that
between April 1941 and March 1942 50%
of Bomber Command’s operations were
against maritime targets.
1 7 2 . General Strategy, par. 3 0 . Cf.
British rejoinder to JB comments on
same in AL (41) 8th Mtg., W a r Cabinet,
C/AC, 29 NOV.1941.
NOV.1941.
‘942.
7 36
American Liaison, Z I Nov. 1941, An-
nex A.
173. General Strategy, par. 30.
174. Bombers’ Battle, by a Wing
Commander (London, 19431, pp. 197-
175. AL (41) 8th Mtg., 2 1 Nov. 1941,
176. Bombers’ Battle, pp. 201-9.
177. H.A. Toulmin, Jr., Air Service,
A.E.F., 1918, chap. xv.
178. William Mitchell, Winged De-
fense, p. 16; Air Service Tactical School,
Bombardment (Washington, 1926), p. 62.
179. ASTS, Bombardment, p. 6; ltr.,
Follett Bradley to Col. W.J. Paul, 10
180. ASTS, Bombardment, p. 6 2 .
181. Ltr., Brig. Gen. H.S. Hansel1 to
author, 24 Feb. 1947.
182. Isaac Don Levine, Mitchell,
Pioneer of Air Power, p. 151; ASTS,
Bombardment, p. 54.
183. Memo for Col. W.J. Paul from
Dr. Chauncey E. Sanders, Relationship
of the Development of AAF Bombing
Doctrine to the Development of the
Modern Bombsight, 10 Mar. 1947.
200.
Annex A.
Apr. ‘947.
184. lbid.
185.Zbid.
186. lbid.
187. AWPD/I, Tab I , par. 5 .
188. lbid.
189. Ibid., par. 6.
190. Zbid., Tab 3 .
191. E.g., Aeroplane, 16 May; I Aug.;
2 2 Aug. 1941.
192. Ltr., Harris to Arnold, z July
‘944.’.
193. Zbid. Cf. CM, London, Harmon
to Arnold, I May 1942.
194. Spaatz Staff Meeting, 10 Sept.
1941, Talk by Brandt on Use of B-17 by
RAF.
195. CM, Lee to W D , 9 July 1942;
CM-57, Chaney to T A G , 2 2 July 1942.
196. Brandt, as in n. 194. Bombers‘
Battle, p. 139, puts this as the first B-17
mission.
197. OCAC, Summary of B-17’s

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.