Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 40 …On recommendation of an American mission sent to Europe in June under newly commissioned Col. Raynal…
  • p. 50 …a r I1 and its self- conceived mission can be appreciated only in light of a…
  • p. 52 …In the lower grades, where promotion was controlled inexorably by seniority, Air Service pilots found themselves…
  • p. 56 …complete control of the Army and form an integral part thereof.” Yet the Crowell mission, appointed…
  • p. 60 …The Lampert Committee went far beyond its designated mission, bringing under review the whole province of…
  • p. 63 …to it a more or less independent mission. Experi- ence in World War I seemed to…
  • p. 65 …Command respon- sibility for that mission within the Air Corps devolved upon the Com- manding General…
  • p. 66 …Navy in further- awe of their respective missions. The Air Corps Tactical School claimed for air…
  • p. 69 …which fights for and gains control of the air,’’ and to calculate a well-balanced air…
  • p. 71 …Mitchell could still believe that “it was an established fact that the principal mission of an…
  • p. 80 …based on the fundamental doctrine that their mission is to aid the ground forces to gain…
  • p. 81 …The mission of the Army was defense of the United States and its outlying territories, but…
  • p. 129 …assigned to the air force an independent mission of strategic bombing. Accordingly, in March 1918 the…
  • p. 155 …By taking control of French or English colonial possessions, victorious Axis powers might lodge themselves at…
  • p. 175 …T h e planners were concerned only with the mission of the US. Army and Navy…
  • p. 235 …Long-standing differences between the Army and Navy over jurisdictional control of offshore patrol had brought…
  • p. 241 …And because the chain of command in both Pacific areas and in Washington vested ultimate control…
  • p. 270 …Other combat activity by pursuit piiots was incidental to scheduled reconnaissance missions, as when on I…
  • p. 273 …Atlantic and India,” would come under his control at Bangal~re.’~ It soon became evident, however…
  • p. 295 …American forces in Burma, and later in India, had as a primary mission the promotion of…
  • p. 306 …The mission of the MAB was to keep current estimates of U.S.-British munitions resources…
  • p. 308 …of a “nucleus of GHQ.” Its original mission was to direct the training of the tactical…
  • p. 314 …The field forces remained under the control of the General Staff, and the War Plans Division…
  • p. 316 …General Arnold’s control of the US. Air Force is as com- plete, virtually, as is…
  • p. 317 …it also made possible a certain indirect control from Washington through letters written more often in…
  • p. 343 …To permit effective control of fighter planes at night or during bad weather would have required…
  • p. 368 …constituted as of 29 May.’l The mission of the new command was, first, “to move…
  • p. 379 …A North African military mission under Brig. Gen. Russell H. Maxwell had been established at Cairo…
  • p. 397 …In helping to prepare HALPRO for overseas movement by air and in controlling the flight along…
  • p. 412 …to perform a series of remarkable special missions. Shuttling between Australia, the Philippines, the Nether- lands…
  • p. 426 …formation of task forces to undertake specific missions, and for their command he was to designate…
  • p. 441 …But of these, four missions involving a total of seventeen bombers were abortive because of un…
  • p. 458 …During January and February the bomber command dispatched approxi- mately sixty heavy bomber missions, for a…
  • p. 464 …attempting a take-off for yet another mission of relief.’ If the Americans on Bataan and…
  • p. 472 …naval control, during which time six of the planes flew the first American bomber mission against…
  • p. 475 …Such missions, however, could be flown only with the greatest expenditure of time and effort. Until…
  • p. 500 …remain in the Far East under the control of General S t i l ~ e l…
  • p. 503 …But circumstances beyond the control of the aircrews were against the flight. Although a fortuitous and…
  • p. 525 …of Midway, nor had it retained operational control of the few planes actually sent up to…
  • p. 527 …If the vulnerable PBY's were shot down while executing their search mission, this was a…
  • p. 549 …those who had flown their first combat mission in April had to fight a feeling of…
  • p. 571 …largest mission to date comprised a total of six bombers- would remain under theater control but…
  • p. 589 …This, the Army felt, might lead ultimately to Navy control of all air forces. As late…
  • p. 620 …At the same time, it initiated projects peculiar to its own mission and by the end…
  • p. 621 …It would work in conjunction with naval forces and under their operational control “wherever this may…
  • p. 646 …the British Joint Staff Mission a t Washington, the American Military Mission at London.” The American…
  • p. 647 …General Chaney opened his headquarters in the American Embassy building on 19 May 1941.'' His mission…
  • p. 648 …Air forces would have two missions: to pro- vide, in certain areas, an “air defense, integrated…
  • p. 649 …Because AAF bombers would have the special mission, in co-operation with the RAF, of attacking…
  • p. 651 …Military Mission in London-under direct control of the commanding general of U S . Field Forces…
  • p. 654 …They consider that function their primary mission here and are not willing to surrender it.1le…
  • p. 659 …bombardment missions, either by direct coverage or by synchronized fighter sweeps. Strategic control of AAF operations…
  • p. 669 …o n ~ . ~ ’ ~Such operations under the RAF control system required numerous modifications for the plane-about…
  • p. 683 …not be adequate to carry out the mission intended for it under GYM- NAST. H e…
  • p. 684 …T o adapt the Eighth Air Force to its new mission required a con- siderable reshuffling…
  • p. 717 …develop- ment of adequate machinery for the control of combat operations by establishing the Provisional I…
  • p. 728 …2 , 27 AUGUST 2942 HE Eighth Air Force flew its first mission in an atmosphere charged…
  • p. 730 …in preparation for initial operations under RAF control. Each of the three squadrons was attached for…
  • p. 731 …Policy concerning the pro- vision and control of fighter escort had not yet been determined, but…
  • p. 735 …Shortly before 1900 hours, watchers on the control tower spotted a cluster of specks to the…
N O T E S T O P A G E S 5 7 8 - 8 5
is given in History, SPOBS, chap. i.
Something of the importance attached to
them in the winter of 1941-42 may be
sensed from the great amount of per-
tinent correspondence in AAF Hq. files.
(For TURBINLFTE see especially,
memo for Arnold from C.E. Duncan,
S/AS, Plan to Establish and Train il
Turbiiilite Squadron [N.F.] in the Brit-
ish Isles, 12 Jan. 1942; memo for Arnold
from Kuter, DC/AS, z May 1942. The
one squadron which was dispatched to
England for this purpose was redesig-
nated 15th Bombardment Squadron [L]
and was the first AAF unit to see action
in the ETO. For cancellation of
SHADOW 82, see RetR, Establishment
of a Shadow Organization in N. Ireland,
AFAEP to AFDOP, 2 5 Apr. 1942. On
TRIGGER, see especially, ltr., Mc-
Narney to Portal, 30 Sept. 1941; AWPD
Division Digest, 9 Apr. 1942.)
87. History, SPOBS, chap. ii.
88. Ltr., Ma!. Gen. A.E. Nye, Dir. of
Staff Duties, War Office to Chaney, 2 7
Sept. 1941; Chaney to Nye, n.d., but in
reply.
89. Ltr., Arnold to Chaney, 8 Nov.
1947.
90. Ltr., Chaney to C/S, Command
Arrangements, US Army Forces in Great
Britain, 20 Sept. 1941.
91. Ltr., Lt. Col. H.L. George,
AWPD to Col. H.L. McClelland, SPOBS,
8 Nov. 1941.
92. Ltr., Chaney to Arnold, 5 Dec.
‘941.
93. Ibid., 1x1. I , Graphic Outline of
the Basic Organization of US Forces in
Great Britain.
94. Memo for Gen. McNarney from
Chaney, 6 Dec. 1941.
95. Letter of Instruction No. 2 , 1 1
Dec. 1941.
96. CM, AGWAR to SPOBS, 8 Jan.
1942.
97. Memo for C G AFCC, etc. from
Arnold, Channels of Communications
with Gen. Chaney, 2 Feb. 1942.
98. See the many requisitions for staff
personnel, of which the following are
examples: CM-368, SPOBS to AGWAR,
7 Jan. 1942; CM-429, London to AG-
7 34
WAR, 16 Jan. 1942; CM-465, London to
AGWAR, 24 Jan. 1942; CM-92, London
to AGWAR, 2 1 Feb. 1942; CM-634,
London to AGWAR, 24 Feb. 1942; CM-
726, London to AGWAR, 9 Mar. 1942.
99. History, VIII AFSC, chap. i.
100. Ltr., Eaker to H.L. George, 5
Mar. 1942.
1 0 1 . The chart, Schematic Organiza-
tion US. Army Air Forces in the United
Kingdom, was indorsed: “Concur for
tentative approval. Chart to be referred
to General Chaney for remark. Lt. Gen.
L.J. McNair.”
1 0 2 . Memo for C/S USAAF in Brit-
ish Isles from Arnold as DC/S, 26 Jan.
‘942.
103. Directive for A-I by C/AS,
Activation of AAF Units for British Isles,
1 1 Feb. 1942.
104. CM-OUT-399 (1-24-42), Arnold
to SPOBS, AF 1/401, 24 Jan. 1942.
10s. CM-465, London to AGWAR,
24 Jan. 1942; CM-495, London to AG-
WAR, 30 Jan. 1942.
106. CM-52, Chaney to GHQ, 3 1 Jan.
1942; memo for A G from C G GHQ,
Organization of US Army Forces in the
UK, 3 Feb. 1942.
107. CCS 40, 16 Feb. 1942.
108. Ltr., Arnold to Eaker, Initial
Directive to Bomber Commander in Eng-
land, 31 Jan. 1942.
109. CM-OUT-472 (26-42), C G
AAF to SPOBS, AF 2/105, 5 Feb. 1942.
1 1 0 . Details Which Must Be Accom-
plished by Bomber Command Advance
Echelon, n.d.
I I I . Memo for JSP, 24 Feb. 1942.
1 1 2 . C M - O U T - ~ I ~(2-12-42), Arnold
113. CM-634, CM-635, CM-636, all
114. Ltrs., Eaker to George, 5 Mar.
1 1 5 . Ltr., Eaker to Spaatz, I Mar.
116. lbid.
117. Ltr., Eaker to George, 5 Mar.
to SPOBS, AF 2/207, 1 2 Feb. 1942.
London to AGWAR, 24 Feb. 1942.
1942; Eaker to Spaatz, I Mar. 1942.
1942.
I942 *

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.