Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 43 …cavalry mounted on gas driven flying horses” never arrived to “sweep the Germans from the sky…
  • p. 46 …Mitchell never received an American air force commensurate with the ambitious idens of air power which…
  • p. 49 …This project, like so many others, had lagged, and the Air Service was never equipped during…
  • p. 50 …the Army or the Air Corps?” but never, “Are you in the Army or the Corps…
  • p. 55 …any Air Service officers, and I have never heard anybody yet-any Air Service officer-against…
  • p. 69 …But one axiom, with its corollaries, never varied. T o him the airplane was first and…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 94 …rate for the time being, the decision never- theless left an open question as to how…
  • p. 121 …large-scale warfare; production of combat types never exceeded 300 aircraft a month. The pattern of…
  • p. 122 …the German Air Force, the Regia Aeronautica never exhibited sufficient power to be decisive in the…
  • p. 133 …Except for a few raids against French factories, the force had never been employed in a…
  • p. 140 …into a complete war economy production was never equal to the demands of our own forces…
  • p. 150 …Long-term needs of the Air Corps and the sudden availability of funds in quantities never…
  • p. 181 …Actually, the Air Staff had never approved of the method followed in RAINBOW No. 5 . l…
  • p. 217 …Members of the Hawaiian Air Force, who had never flown heavy bombers, began to receive intensive…
  • p. 219 …were not then satisfactory for permanent garrisons. Never- theless, the commander of the Hawaiian Department, Lt…
  • p. 227 …T h e planes never reached their destination. Other bombardment units were being prepared for transfer…
  • p. 241 …responsible officers, a few crucial points have never been satisfactorily explained. T h e general pattern…
  • p. 277 …motors, sole- noids, and gun mounts-were never found. After many hours of fruit- less search…
  • p. 288 …planners and from which AAF Headquarters was never to deviate. The translation of the accepted grand…
  • p. 303 …the principal features of the plan were never challenged, it was subsequently revised in a draft…
  • p. 309 …W a r Plans Division was never incorporated into GHQ and remained a potential rival to…
  • p. 336 …the shooting and wrote that they were never able to make out an airplane.g6It is…
  • p. 412 …As it happened, the B-24's never returned to India, but, instead, remained in the…
  • p. 457 …Meanwhile the Edsall with the remaining pilots had headed for Java, never to be heard from…
  • p. 492 …Squadron was assigned, but which it would never reach, going from Australia to Tongatabu; ( 3 ) Christmas…
  • p. 500 …deck of a carrier presented a problem never before challenged by Army planes. Hence an accelerated…
  • p. 502 …the bows and wetting the flight deck. Never before had this been accomplished, yet now it…
  • p. 509 …Island, in the Louisiade Archipelago.” They were never needed, for on 7-8 May the two…
  • p. 513 …exist, it was at a point which never reached the aircrews, for on the operational level…
  • p. 524 …handicaps under which AAF planes had operated. Never were more than fourteen B- I 7’s…
  • p. 527 …AAF planners clung firmly to their belief that proper observance of economy of force would never…
  • p. 531 …Crews which had previously never loaded torpedoes now for the first time fitted these weapons into…
  • p. 544 …But the Japanese never at any time based their bombers in appreciable numbers a t either…
  • p. 548 …26's in torpedo-dropping, but they never would be put into All told, the record…
  • p. 556 …until it had been thoroughly trained and never to com- mit it piecemeal. General Magruder had…
  • p. 560 …pressed into service against the Germans," and never reached the CBI." Colonel Haynes had reached India…
  • p. 606 …reason that the Antilles Air Task Force never evolved, as did I Bomber Command, into an…
  • p. 614 …that reason deserving a high priority, could never dispose of the U-boat menace but must…
  • p. 635 …In Washington the Munitions Assign- ments Board t had never considered this schedule as more than…
  • p. 670 …they bombed from 39,200 feet, and never below 30,000. By AAF standards they had…
  • p. 672 …Goering had never put enough bombers over England, nor had he concentrated his forces on the…
  • p. 690 …of co-operation and combined action probably never before equaled by the military forces of two…
  • p. 729 …shoot at aerial targets, and several had never operated a turret in the air. This deficiency…
57. Memo for Arnold from Towers,
14 Feb. 1942. The AAF had sought in-
formation concerning the proposed em-
ployment of the planes requested (see
R&R, Arnold to Harmon, 3 Feb. 1942).
In his memorandum of 14 February
Admiral Towers declared: “The uncer-
tainty as to the precise areas in which
the Fleet may be called upon to operate
makes it impracticable to list with pre-
cision the operating areas and bases of
the requested landplane bombers. rn
general, they are assigned to Fleet Patrol
Wings, with the exception of two Marine
medium bombardment groups for de-
fense of outlying bases for which the
Navy has accepted responsibility. It may
be expected that they will be employed
in northern waters, where seaplane op-
eration is difficult or impossible by reason
of ice conditions, and from shore bases
elsewhere, in the discharge of Naval air
functions, where their performance ren-
ders them superior to seaplane patrol
planes.”
58. See for example, memo for C/S
from Arnold, 2 5 Feb. 1942; R&R, Arnold
to Maj. Gen. M.F. Harmon, 2 Feb. 1942.
59. Ltr., Arnold to King, 9 Mar. 1942.
60. See AAFAC files 1 1 5 . 5 1 and
I 15.52; report, The Coastal Command
System of Operational Control, 17 Feb.
1942; conference with Comdr. R.B. Mar-
tineau, 17 July 1942; digest of agreement,
Admiralty and Air Ministry, covering
exercise of operational control, 24 Apr.
1941, supplied through courtesy of Dr.
E.L. Bowles; Coastal Command, T h e Air
Ministry Account of the Part Played by
Coastal Command in the Battle of the
Seas, 1939-1942 (New York, 1943).
61. Lt. Gen. Joseph T. McNarney’s
notes on trip to First Air Force and
I Bomber Command, 2 3 Apt. 1942;memo
for Arnold [from AFRDBI, 20 May
1942; memo for T A G by OPD, 27 May
1942; ltr., Hq. Third AF to C G AAF,
15 June 1942.
62. Memo for Col. Glantzberry from
Col. F.R. Pitts, 20 Aug. 1942;McNarney’s
notes, as cited in n. 61.
63. See sources as cited in n. 62; also
ltr., Marshall to King, 17 Sept. 1942, Tab
XIVA, in Bowles report to S/W, The
N O T E S T O P A G E S 5 4 0 - 5 1
Acute Problem of Ocean-borne Trans-
port and Supply.
64. Draft of plans, n.d., ns., and notes
for conference on improvement in anti-
submarine operations, I June 1942, in
AAFAC files 1 1 3 . 3 and 001. Cf. memo
for AC/S, OPD from AC/AS, Plans, 4
June 1942, in Plans file 111-R-2, Bk. I ,
which is Virtually the same plan.
65. Memo for Marshall from King, 2 1
June 1942, Tab XIIB, in Bowles report.
66. See sources cited in n. 64.
67. Ltr., AM P.B. Joubert to Lord
Halifax, 16 Aug. 1942,Tab II B, in Three
Essays. This letter was sent in answer
to Lord Halifax’s request for information
concerning British experience which
might be of help to the United States in
its antisubmarine campaign.
68. Memo for CG EDC from AC/S,
OPD, 2 0 May 1942; memo for C G AAF
from AC/S, OPD, 20 May 1942.
69. See sources cited in n. 64.
70. Memo for King from McNarney,
26 May 1942.
7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June
1942; ltr., King to Comdrs. ESF and
GSF, 10 June 1942.
7 2 . Memo for King from Marshall, 19
June 1942, Tab XIIA, in Bowles report.
73. Memo for Marshall from King,
2 1 June 1942. Cf. ltr., King to Marshall,
10 June 1942.
74. Memo for Marshall from King,
2 1 June 1942.
75. Memo for Knox from Stimson. 7
July 1942.
76. Memo for Stimson from Knox, 10
July 1942.
77. Memo for Knox from Stimson, 2 3
J ~ Y1942.
78. Memo for CG AAF from Brig.
Gen. T.T. Handy, 27 June 1942; memo
for S/W from Dr. Bowles, 7 Aug. 1942.
79. History, 1st Sea Search Attack
Gp., especially Apps. 3 and 4. Cf. draft
chapter, SADU, in AAFAC file.
80. History, 1st Sea Search Attack Gp.
81. Zbid. Care should be taken in
accepting operational information re-
ported in history of the 1st SSA Group
73‘

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.