Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
demonstrate the necessity of a preparedness program for our air
force.” * The present history has no such dogmatic aim. Its authors
believe with one of the wisest military leaders of our generation that
“in our democracy where the government is truly an agent of the
popular will, military policy is dependent on public opinion” and
that the historian can render “the most essential service in determining
the public policy relating to National Defense.” But they have taken
to heart also his warning that historians “have been inclined to record
victories and gloss over the mistakes and wasteful sacrifices” and that
it is very important that the true facts, the causes and consequences
that make our military history, should be matters of common knowl-
edge.” t The present authors make no claims to have succeeded in
following this counsel of perfection, but they have tried to set down as
they have understood it the story of the Army air arm for the people
to whom that arm belongs.
This book, then, may be considered as a final report to the American
public on the activities of the AAF in World War 11. It is not an
official report in the ordinary sense of that term-one to which the
Air Staff necessarily subscribes in all its details and final conclusions.
Rather it is the report of a group of professionally trained historians
who during the war enjoyed an unusual opportunity for access to the
files of the AAF while those files were still active, and who since the
termination of hostilities have received the co-operation of Head-
quarters, United States Air Force, in plans to provide for the American
public a comprehensive account of their findings. It is pertinent, there-
fore, to include here a brief account of the historical program of which
this history is an end product and to tell something about the back-
ground of the book and its authors.
After the United States entered World War 11, the Army Air
Forces was among the first organizations to display an active interest
in maintaining a historical record. The first hectic months after Pearl
Harbor left little time in a military headquarters for consideration of
anything beyond the ways and means of meeting each successive
emergency call. But in June 1942 the Chief of the Air Staff directed
that a professional historian be secured for the preparation of “a run-
< c *
* H. A. Toulmin, Air Service, AEF, 1918 (New York, 1 9 2 7 ) ~Foreword,. p. v.
+‘‘National Organization for War,” an address before the joint meeting of the
American Military Institute and the American Historical Association, Washington,
28 Dec. 1939, in Selected Speeches and Stntements of General of the Army George C.
Marshall, ed. Maj. H. A. DeWeerd (Washington, 1945), pp. 35-39.
viii

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.