Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I1
portant air Similar opinions were voiced frequently by
Pershing,Io6and a year before his retirement they received their most
authoritative formulation as doctrine in the Field Service Regulations,
U.S. Army, revised by the General Staff and promulgated on 2 No-
vember 1 9 2 3 .
The authors of this manual derive their theory of war from Clause-
witz. “The ultimate objective of all military operations is the destruc-
tion of the enemy’s armed forces by battle. Decisive defeat in battle
breaks the enemy’s will to war and forces him to sue for peace.” lo7
Decisive results are obtained only by an offensive, which is made suc-
cessful by the concentration of superior forces “both on the ground
and in the air” at the proper place and time.los Such concentration, to
be effective, involves teamwork. “No one arm wins battles. The com-
bined employment of all arms is essential to success.” looBut the “CO-
ordinating principle which underlies the employment of the combined
arms is that the mission of the infantry is the general mission of the
entire force. The special missions of other arms are derived from
their powers to contribute to the execution of the infantry mis-
sion.” In short, infantry was still queen of battles, the air arm only
one of her several handmaidens.
Sections devoted specifically to the Air Service elaborate this point
of view. For observation and attack aviation its validity is obvious.111
Pursuit, the “most vital element of the air service,” establishes and
maintains air supremacy by its “essentially offensive” operations, thus
affording effective protection to other air categories and to ground
troops.112The enlightening proposition that the “mission of bombard-
ment aviation is the bombardment of ground objectives” is amplified
by a designation of the most important targets. These lie “beyond the
effective range of artillery,” but apparently not far beyond; they con-
sist of objectives “vital to the functioning of the enemy’s line of com-
munication and supply.”113 There is no mention of strikes against
the industrial system which constituted the source of his supply; pre-
sumably such operations were not to be considered profitable. The
chief mission of aviation was close support of ground forces.
The Field Service Regulations had not been revised in whole
when World War I1 began. But, being general in character, they had
been framed with the idea that each arm would describe its principles
of combat in its own training and in the Air Service
(Corps) these were subject to periodic changes. The revisions reflect,
4 4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.