Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
N O T E S T O P A G E S 9 3 - 1 0 5
Separate Branch of the British Military
Services, I May 1944, in special file cited
in n. 9; Hilary St. George Saunders, Per
Ardua: T h e Rise of British A i r Power,
1911-1939 (London, 19451, pp. ZIO, 259,
3 17-2 I .
31. Saunders, Per Ardun.
32. Special AAF Historical Study, Re-
view of Aerial Warfare for the Scientific
Advisory Board (Jan. 1945).
33. Arps and Quigley report.
34. For the following account see
T h e Battle of Britain, British Air Minis-
try account (New York, 1941); USSBS,
Over-all Report (European W a r ); Arps
and Quigley report.
35. USSBS, Over-all Report (Euro-
pean War);and T h e Effects of Strategic
Bombing on German W a r Economy
36. “Since the Battle of Britain,” RAF
37. Notes on the German Air Force.
38. Notes on the Russian Air Force,
in special file cited in n. 9.
39. Arps and Quigley report; Notes
on the German Air Force.
40. Air Ministry, Royal A i r Force
W a r Manual, Pt.I, Operations, Air Pub-
lication 1300, Feb. 1940.
41. [bid.; Production of Heavy Bomb-
ers in the United States of America
(British source, n.d.), in AFSHO files.
42. AL (41) 8th Mtg., War Cabinet,
American Liaison, 21 Nov. 1941; J.B. No.
325 (Serial No. 729), 25 Sept. 1941, Joint
Board to SPOBS, Comments on General
(Oct. 1945).
Journal, No. 11 (Sept. 1943)~p. 10.
Strategy, Review by the British Chiefs of
Staff.
NOTES TO CHAPTER 4
I. Message to the Congress, in State
Dept. collection of documents, Peace and
W a r : U.S. Foreign Policy, i931-1941
(Washington, 1943), pp. 403-5.
2 . Message to the Congress, I Z Jan.
1939, ibid., pp. 451-54.
3. On this general topic see Walter
Johnson, T h e Battle against Isolation
678
(Chicago, 1944). This book shows the
close relations between Roosevelt and
the Committee T o Defend America by
Aiding the Allies.
4. O n 5 September. Events Leading up
to W o r l d W a r 11, H. Doc. 541 (78th
Cong., zd sess.), p. 215 (hereinafter cited
as Events).
5 . Lend-Lease Directive No. I.
6. Peace and W a r , p. 452.
7. Statement of Maj. Gen. H.H.
Arnold, Chief of the Air Corps, Relative
to Air Corps Estimates for Fiscal Year
1941, dated 3/1/40.
8. AAF Historical Study No. 16, Leg-
islation Relating to the AAF Personnel
Program, 1939 to May 1944, pp. 1-12;
AAF Historical Study No. 22, Legislation
Relating to the AAF Materiel Program,
pp. ~ p - 2 0 ; N e w York Times, 5 Apr. 1939.
9. Report of Commanding General
A A F t o Secretary of W a r , 3 Jan. 1944;
N e u York Times, 5 Apr. 1939.
10. Arnold statement as cited in n. 7;
address of Maj. Gen. H.H. Arnold before
graduating class, Air Corps Tactical
School, 5 Dec. 1939. The appropriations
necessary for the undertaking of this
program, also known at times as the 2 5
Group Program, were provided by Public
No. 18 (76th Cong., 1st sess.), 53 Stat.
5 5 5 , 3 Apr. 1939, and Public No. 164,
53 Stat. 9949 I July 1939.
11. The 41 Group Program became
actually an integral part of the 54 Group
Program. Public No. 611 (76th Cong.,
3d sess.), 54 Stat. 350, 13 June 1940, and
Public No. 667, 54 Stat. 599, 26 June 1940,
appropriated funds covering the per-
sonnel and aircraft requirements of no
more than forty-one groups. That figure
remained the limit for which funds had
been appropriated until Public No. 800
(76th Cong., 3d sess.), 54 Stat. 965, 8 Oct.
1940, provided funds covering the differ-
ence between a 41-group and 54-group
objective.
12. A G 580 (628-40) M-F to C/AC,
Army’s First Aviation Objective, 29 June
1940; memo for C/S from Brig. Gen.
B.K. Yount, AC/AC, 6 Aug. 1940.
GHQAF and C/AC, Army’s Second
13. A G 580 (3-7-41) M-C-M to C G

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.