Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
has brought with it a new doctrine of war.. .and a new doctrine of
peace.” 8 4
Formerly the oceans had made difficult any attack against the
United States, but the “coming of aircraft has greatly modified this
isolation on account of the great range and speed which these agents
of communication are developing.” The heart of the nation’s war po-
tential lay in a triangle marked by Bangor, Norfolk, and Chicago.85
The complex functioning of that area was so delicately balanced as to
be highly vulnerable to air attack. Bombers could paralyze transporta-
tion by hitting a few chokepoints, could render governmental and in-
dustrial centers impotent: “A few shells, gas, explosive or incendiary,
landed in Manhattan would cause a complete evacuation.” 8 0 Disrupt
the tightly integrated activities of that vital triangle, and “resistance
is no longer possible and capitulation is the outcome.” 8 7
Even in the air age geography favored the United States; it was
far less open to air attack than European nations. But its immunity,
only relative, was steadily diminishing with improved performance of
aircraft. At first Mitchell was greatly concerned with the possibility
of carrier-borne attacks against America once that fast “floating air-
dromes” had been adapted to the use of bombers. His belief, however,
in the inherent superiority of land-based over carrier-based or float
planes and the increasing range of the former made them appear the
chief threat. In 1925 Mitchell pointed out that England could trans-
port aircraft to the St. Lawrence area whence they could menace the
whole of the vital triangle; in 1927 he was claiming that parts of
that region could be attacked directly from His main con-
cern, however, was with the northern approaches to the American
continent. Airplanes already in service could easily cross the North At-
lantic, staging from island to island with no overwater flight of more
than 400 miles. In the North Pacific only the narrow Bering Strait
separated Siberia from Alaska, and farther south the Aleutians con-
stituted a natural avenue of approach. Eventually, he thought, aircraft
would “follow the meridians straight over the top of the earth.”
Against a waterborne attack an efficient air force would be the
cheapest form of protection; against the new threat it was the only
defense. Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be
completely stopped, but their effects could best be held to a minimum
by aggressive air action, and U.S. aviation should be organized ac-
cordingly. Defensive air units, chiefly pursuit, should be assigned for
40

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.