Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
R O U E N - S O T T E V I L L E N O . I
from the United Kingdom, aimed at Germany’s war potential, had
been envisaged in the early war plans as a prerequisite to the invasion
of Europe and the ultimate defeat of Germany. T h e USAAF had
contended consistently that given adequate forces they could, in co-
operation with the RAF, carry out such an offensive and do it, more-
over, so effectively that an assault on Festung Europa could be
accomplished with the least possible loss in men and ground ma-
t e ~ i e l . ~ ~But it was clear that to do so the AAF would need aircraft
in unprecedented numbers. This meant, in effect, a top-if not an over-
riding-priority for the air program in American war p r o d u ~ t i o n . ~ ~
But the higher authorities, faced with the problem of adapting limit-
less demands to resources that were strictly limited, had of necessity
to allot priorities carefully and in accordance with very long-term
strategic plans. If the air program was to be implemented in full,
clearly the programs of the Ground Forces and the Navy could not
be. And in the summer of 1942 it was anything but a foregone con-
clusion that the weapons of air power should be given precedence
over those items-tanks and battleships, for example-which carried
with them the reassuring weight of military tradition. Here again it
was up to the exponents of air power to demonstrate the feasibility of
strategic bombardment.
Thus, both strategic and logistical planning, insofar as they in-
volved air power, depended to a great, possibly even to a decisive,
degree on the ability of the Allied air forces to prove that they could
bomb Germany successfully. With reference to the USAAF, in
particular, since it had become committed to a policy of bombing
precision targets in daylight from high altitudes, long-range planning
depended on the ability of the Eighth Air Force to show that it could
do the job and do it economically enough to make it a practicable
operation of war. So far, the confidence of American and British air-
men in the soundness of their strategic and tactical doctrines arose out
of deep faith in the potentialities of air power rather than from an
adequate store of experience. T h e German effort to cripple Britain
in 1940-41 had demonstrated what ought not to be done rather than
what might reasonably be expected from strategic bombardment. O n
the other hand, the subsequent bombing of Germany by the RAF
had as yet been conducted on a scale too limited and in a manner too
specialized to answer conclusively the opponents of air power. As for
667

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.