Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
R O U E N - S O T T E V I L L E N O . I
from the United Kingdom, aimed at Germany’s war potential, had
been envisaged in the early war plans as a prerequisite to the invasion
of Europe and the ultimate defeat of Germany. T h e USAAF had
contended consistently that given adequate forces they could, in co-
operation with the RAF, carry out such an offensive and do it, more-
over, so effectively that an assault on Festung Europa could be
accomplished with the least possible loss in men and ground ma-
t e ~ i e l . ~ ~But it was clear that to do so the AAF would need aircraft
in unprecedented numbers. This meant, in effect, a top-if not an over-
riding-priority for the air program in American war p r o d u ~ t i o n . ~ ~
But the higher authorities, faced with the problem of adapting limit-
less demands to resources that were strictly limited, had of necessity
to allot priorities carefully and in accordance with very long-term
strategic plans. If the air program was to be implemented in full,
clearly the programs of the Ground Forces and the Navy could not
be. And in the summer of 1942 it was anything but a foregone con-
clusion that the weapons of air power should be given precedence
over those items-tanks and battleships, for example-which carried
with them the reassuring weight of military tradition. Here again it
was up to the exponents of air power to demonstrate the feasibility of
strategic bombardment.
Thus, both strategic and logistical planning, insofar as they in-
volved air power, depended to a great, possibly even to a decisive,
degree on the ability of the Allied air forces to prove that they could
bomb Germany successfully. With reference to the USAAF, in
particular, since it had become committed to a policy of bombing
precision targets in daylight from high altitudes, long-range planning
depended on the ability of the Eighth Air Force to show that it could
do the job and do it economically enough to make it a practicable
operation of war. So far, the confidence of American and British air-
men in the soundness of their strategic and tactical doctrines arose out
of deep faith in the potentialities of air power rather than from an
adequate store of experience. T h e German effort to cripple Britain
in 1940-41 had demonstrated what ought not to be done rather than
what might reasonably be expected from strategic bombardment. O n
the other hand, the subsequent bombing of Germany by the RAF
had as yet been conducted on a scale too limited and in a manner too
specialized to answer conclusively the opponents of air power. As for
667

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.