Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
Implications
When the small force of B-17'~from VIII Bomber Command took
to the air on 17 August 1942, they carried with them much more
than a bomb load of trouble for the enemy. They carried with them
a long heritage of debate and controversy. And they began an experi-
ment in strategic bombardment which was destined to answer a num-
ber of questions vitally affecting the entire course of the war in
Europe. In the summer of 1942, Allied plans, both strategic and logis-
tical, lay in a state of extreme uncertainty. Certain major decisions
had been made, but only tentatively, and the over-all plan of the war
remained the subject of open discussion at the highest
Although basic Allied war plans had indicated Germany as global
enemy No. I , it was still an open question to what extent US. heavy
bombardment should be committed to operations in the European
theater a t the expense of the Pacific. T o those responsible for the war
against Japan, especially the US. Navy, it seemed by no means clear
that the war against Germany should receive priority in air equip-
ment, if indeed it should receive priority at all. And in July 1942 it
had been decided that American commitments to BOLERO should
be readjusted in the interests of offensive operation in the Pa~ific.~"
A debate ensued as to the precise nature and extent of this planned
diversion, a debate which continued through the late summer and
early fall of that year, and which turned in large part on the ability
of the American heavy bombers to do a job in Europe of sufficient
strategic value to justify the degree of priority required for a major
air offensive in that theater. In fact, it was not until the Casablanca
conference in January 1943 that the full-scale bomber offensive
envisaged by American and British air strategists was given an un-
assailable place in Allied strategy. Meanwhile, it was up to the bomber
units of the Eighth Air Force to demonstrate that they could bomb
the enemy in broad daylight heavily enough and accurately enough
and with a sufficiently low rate of loss to make the American part of
the projected off ensive-the bombing of selected installations by day-
a practicable reality.
Then there was the question of priority in production, which in
August 1942 was becoming the object of a prolonged and crucial
controversy among American planners. A strategic bomber offensive
666

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.